Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:05:28.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three concepts of recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Jens Bartelson
Jens Bartelson*
Affiliation:
Lund University, Lund, Sweden
*
E-mail: jens.bartelson@svet.lu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 107 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abizadeh, A. 2005. “Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity.” American Political Science Review 99(1):45–60.Google Scholar
Anaya, S.J. 2004. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, A. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, A 2009. “Rethinking Sovereignty in International Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 5:291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J.S.Cronin, B.. 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Organization 48(1):107–130.Google Scholar
Bartelson, J. 1998. “Second Natures: Is the State Identical With Itself?” European Journal of International Relations 4(3):295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, L.A. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M.B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55(3):429–444.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. 2006. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2012. Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabry, M. 2010. Recognizing States. International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, T.M. 1992. “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance.” American Journal of International Law 86(1):46–91.Google Scholar
Greenhill, B. 2008. “Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 14(2):343–368.Google Scholar
Haacke, J. 2005. “The Frankfurt School and International Relations: On the Centrality of Recognition.” Review of International Studies 31:181–194.Google Scholar
Havercroft, J. 2008. “Sovereignty, Recognition, and Indigenous Peoples.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Price R., 112–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1991. The Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A 2011. “Recognition Between States: On the Moral Substrate of International Relations.” In The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations, edited by Ringmar E. and Lindemann T., 25–38. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Keene, E. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, E 2007. “A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-Making Against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century.” International Organization 61(2):311–339.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1941. “Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations.” American Journal of International Law 35:605–617.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. 1969. Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kompridis, N. 2007. “Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition: A Matter of Identity, Justice, or Freedom?” European Journal of Political Theory 6(3):277–289.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. 1999. Sovereignty. Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kundera, M. 1998. Identity. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. 1944. “Recognition of States in International Law.” Yale Law Journal 53(3):385–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, R.N. 2008. Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, R.N 2010. Why Nations Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, R.N 2012. The Politics and Ethics of Identity. In Search of Ourselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, T. 2010. Causes of War. The Struggle for Recognition. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Markell, P. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Markell, P 2007. “The Potential and the Actual. Mead, Honneth, and the ‘I’.” In Recognition and Power. Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, edited by van den Brink B. and Owen D., 100–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, S. 2003. The Riddle of All Constitutions: International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, N. 2011. Recognition as Constitution. unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A. 1986. “Some Other Kinds of Otherness: A Critique of ‘Rational Choice’ Theories.” In Development. Democracy and the Art of Trespassing: Essays in Honor of Albert Hirschman, edited by Foxley A., McPherson M.S. and O'Donnell G., 355–373. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A 1991. “On the Individualistic Theory of Social Order.” In Social Theory for a Changing Society, edited by Bourdieu P. and Coleman J.S., 209–234. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. 2001. “Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty.” Review of International Studies 27(4):519–538.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, C 2011. “The Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System.” International Organization 65(2):207–242.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 2005. The Course of Recognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ringmar, E. 1996. Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. 2005. Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.M. 1995. “International Law in a World of Liberal States.” European Journal of International Law 6:503–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P.Flament, C.. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1(2):149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. 1995. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Philosophical Arguments, edited by Taylor, S., 255–256. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, J. 2000. “Struggles over Recognition and Distribution.” Constellations 7(4):469–482.Google Scholar
Tully, J 2001. “The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom.” In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, edited by Ivison D., Patton P. and Saunders W., 36–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. 2009. After the Globe, Before the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, A 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable.” European Journal of International Relations 9(4):491–542.Google Scholar
Wendt, A 2004. “The State as Person in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 30(2):289–316.Google Scholar
Wight, M. 1972. “International Legitimacy.” International Relations 4(1):1–28.Google Scholar
Williams, R.R. 1997. Hegel's Ethics of Recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, R. 2011. “Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition.” International Theory 3(1):105–142.Google Scholar
Zarakol, A. 2010. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zurn, C.F. 2003. “Identity or Status? Struggles over ‘Recognition’ in Fraser, Honneth, and Taylor.” Constellations 10(4):519–537.Google Scholar