Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:24:25.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The box and Hausdorff dimension of self-affine sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Tim Bedford  and
Mariusz Urbański
Tim Bedford
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 356, 2600 AJ Delft, The Netherlands
Mariusz Urbański
Affiliation:
Intytut Matematyki, Uniwersytet M. Kopernika, ul. Chopina 12/18, 87–100 Toruń, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Under a natural assumption the Hausdorff dimension of a measure μ canonically associated with a given self-affine set is computed. A simplified proof of Bowen's formula for the box dimension of self-affine sets proved earlier is given. A condition for the box dimension and Hausdorff dimension to be equal is proven, and a collection of examples in which this condition can be checked is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 627 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

[Be1]Bedford, T.. Hausdorff dimension and box dimension in self-similar sets. Proc. Topology and Measure V, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald (1988).Google Scholar
[Be2]Bedford, T.. The box dimension of self-affine graphs and repellers. Nonlinearity 2 (1989), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BR]Bohr, T. & Rand, D. A.. The entropy function for characteristic exponents. Physica 25D (1986), 387–398.Google Scholar
[Bo1]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 470, Springer (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Bo2]Bowen, R.. Hausdorff dimension of quasi-circles. Publ. Math. IHES 50 (1979), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[E]Erdös, P.. On the smoothness properties of a family of Bernoulli convolutions. Amer. J. Math. 62 (1940), 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[F]Falconer, K. J.. The Geometry of Fractal Sets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[H]Hutchinson, J. E.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K]Kono, N.. On self-affine functions II. Japan J. Appl. Math. 5 (1988), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[MM]Manning, A. & McCluskey, H.. Hausdorff dimension for horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 3 (1983), 251–260.Google Scholar
[PU]Przytycki, F. & Urbański, M.. On the Hausdorff dimension of some fractal sets. Studia Math. 93 (1989), 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[R]Ruelle, D.. Thermodynamic formalism: the mathematical structures of classical equilibrium statistical mechanics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Vol. 5, Addison-Wesley (1978).Google Scholar
[U]Urbański, M.. The probability distribution and Hausdorff dimension of self-affine functions. Prob. Th. and Rel. Fields 84 (1990), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar