Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T05:59:21.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the topology of manifolds with completely integrable geodesic flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Gabriel P. Paternain
Gabriel P. Paternain
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that if M is a compact simply connected Riemannian manifold whose geodesic flow is completely integrable with periodic integrals, then M is rationally elliptic, i.e. the rational homotopy of M is finite dimensional. We also show that rational ellipticity is shared by simply connected compact manifolds whose cotangent bundle admits a multiplicity free compact action that leaves invariant the Hamiltonian associated with some Riemannian metric. In particular it follows that if M is a Riemannian manifold whose geodesic flow is completely integrable by the Thimm method, then M is rationally elliptic. Other questions concerning the global behaviour of geodesics on homogeneous spaces are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 109 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arnold, V. I. (ed). Dynamical Systems III, Encylopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer Verlag: Berlin, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Berger, M. & Bott, R.. Sur les variétés à courbure strictement positive. Topology 1 (1962), 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bowen, R.. Entropy for group endomorphisms and homogeneous spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 153 (1971), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Eschenburg, J.-H.. New examples of manifolds with strictly positive curvature. Invent. Math. 66 (1982), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Cheeger, J.. Some examples of manifolds of nonnegative curvature. J. Diff. Geom. 8 (1972), 623–628.Google Scholar
[6]Dinaburg, E. I.. On the relations among various entropy characteristics of dynamical systems. Math. USSR Izv. 5 (1971) 337–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fomenko, A. T.. Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Freire, A. & Mañé, R.. On the entropy of the geodesic flow in manifolds without conjugate points. Invent. Math. 69 (1982), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Gromoll, D. & Meyer, W.. An exotic sphere with nonnegative sectional curvature. Ann. Math. 100 (1974), 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Gromov, M.. Entropy, homology and semialgebraic Geometry. Séminarie Bourbaki 38eme année 663 (1985–1986), 225–240.Google Scholar
[11]Gromov, M.. Homotopical effects of dilatation. J. Diff. Geom. 13 (1978), 303–310.Google Scholar
[12]Grove, K. & Halperin, S.. Contributions of rational homotopy theory to global problems in geometry. Publ. Math. IHES 56 (1982), 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Guillemin, V. & Steinberg, S.. Symplectic Techniques in Physics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
[14]Guillemin, V. & Sternberg, S.. On collective complete integrability according to the method of Thimm. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 3 (1983), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Guillemin, V. & Sternberg, S.. Multiplicity-free spaces. J. Diff. Geom. 19 (1984), 31–56.Google Scholar
[16]Guillemin, V. & Sternberg, S.. Convexity properties of the moment mapping. Invent. Math. 67 (1982), 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Kozlov, V. V.. Integrability and non-integrability in Hamiltonian mechanics. Russian Math. Surveys 38 (1983), 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Krämer, M.. Sphärische Untergruppen in kompakten zusammenhängenden Liegruppen. Compositio Mathematica 38 (1979), 129–153.Google Scholar
[19]Manning, A.. Topological entropy for geodesic flows. Ann. Math. 110 (1979), 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Mishchenko, A. S. & Fomenko, A. T.. Euler equations on finite-dimensional Lie groups. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 42 (1978), 396–415.Google Scholar
[21]Paternain, G. P.. Entropy and completely integrable Hamiltonians. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. to appear.Google Scholar
[22]Paternain, G. P. & Spatzier, R. J.. New examples of manifolds with completely integrable geodesic flows. Preprint series of the Stony Brook Inst. for the Math. Sciences (1990).Google Scholar
[23]Thimm, A.. Integrable geodesic flows on homogeneous spaces. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1981), 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Wallach, N. R.. Compact homogeneous Riemannian manifolds with strictly positive curvature. Ann. Math. 96 (1972), 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Yomdin, Y.. Volume growth and entropy. Israel J. Math. 57 (1987), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar