Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:44:15.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of relatedness in maltreated and nonmaltreated children: Connections among multiple representational models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Michael Lynch  and
Dante Cicchetti
Michael Lynch
Affiliation:
Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester
Dante Cicchetti
Affiliation:
Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined children's reports of relatedness to multiple relationship figures in a population of low SES maltreated (N = 115) and nonmaltreated (N = 100) children, ranging in age from 7 to 13 years old. Relatedness scales were administered to children as part of individual interviews given in the context of a summer day camp. Consistent with prior normative research, it was found that the two dimensions of relatedness–emotional quality and psychological proximity-seeking–are negatively correlated with each other. Moreover, patterns of relatedness, based on the configuration of children's scores on both dimensions, reflect group differences, with maltreated children more likely to have confused patterns of relatedness and nonmaltreated children more likely to have optimal patterns. Connections were examined among children's self-reported feelings of relatedness for different relationship figures. Substantial concordance was found among the children's reports of relatedness with their mothers, their teachers, and their best friends. Evidence is presented to support the claim that children form both global and specific models of relationships. The findings are discussed in terms of attachment and self-system theory.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 207 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pensky, E. (1988). Developmental history, personality, and family relationships: Toward an emergent family system. In Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.), Relationships within families (pp. 193–217). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. In Bretherton, I. & Waters, E. (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, (1–2 Serial No. 209), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, V., Cicchetti, D., Barnett, D., & Braunwald, K. (1989a). Disorganized/disoriented attachment relationships in maltreated infants. Developmental Psychology, 25, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, V., Cicchetti, D., Barnett, D., & Braunwald, K. (1989b). Finding order in disorganization: Lessons from research on maltreated infants' attachments to their caregivers. In Cicchetti, D. & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 494–528). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (1990). The organization and coherence of socioemotional, cognitive, and representational development: Illustrations through a developmental psychopathology perspective on Down syndrome and child maltreatment. In Thompson, R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 36: Socioemotional development (pp. 259–366). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Beeghly, M. (1987). Symbolic development in maltreated youngsters: An organizational perspective. In Cicchetti, D. & Beeghly, M. (Eds.), Symbolic development in atypical children (pp. 47–68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., Cummings, M., Greenberg, M., & Marvin, R. (1990). An organizational perspective on attachment theory beyond infancy: Implications for theory, measurement, and research. In Greenberg, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, M. (Eds.), Attachment during the preschool years (pp. 3–49). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., Ganiban, J., & Barnett, D. (1991). Contributions from the study of high risk populations to understanding the development of emotion regulation. In Garber, J. & Dodge, K. (Eds.), The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation (pp. 15–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D., Lynch, M., Shonk, S., & Todd-Manly, J. (in press). An organizational perspective on peer relations in maltreated children. In Parke, R. D. & Ladd, G. W. (Eds.), Family-peer relationships: Modes of linkage. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Todd-Manly, J. (1990). Personal perspectives on conducting research with maltreating families: Problems and solutions. In Brody, E. & Sigel, I. (Eds.), Family research journeys, Vol. 2: Families at risk (pp. 87–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In Cicchetti, D. & Beeghly, M. (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In Gunnar, M. & Sroufe, L. A. (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (in preparation). Relatedness to others in middle childhood and adolescence. Manuscript, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Coster, W. J., Gersten, M. S., Beeghly, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1989). Communicative functioning in maltreated toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 25, 1020–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, E., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L., & Trost, M. (1973). Long-term follow-up of early detected children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, P. M. (1981). Abusing, neglecting, problematic, and adequate dyads: Differentiating by patterns of interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 27, 201–208.Google Scholar
Crittenden, P. M. (1988). Distorted patterns of relationship in maltreating families: The role of internal representational models. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 6, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, P. M. (1990). Internal representational models of attachment relationships. Infant Mental Health Journal, 11, 259–277.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, P., & Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachment and child abuse. In Cicchetti, D. & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 432–463). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, P. M., & DiLalla, D. L. (1988). Compulsive compliance: The development of an inhibitory coping strategy in infancy. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 585–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egeland, B., Jacobvitz, D., & Sroufe, L. A. (1988). Breaking the cycle of abuse. Child Development, 59, 1080–1088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1981). Developmental sequelae of maltreatment in infancy. New Directions for Child Development, 11, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, M. F., Egeland, B., & Pianta, R. (1989). The effects of maltreatment on the development of young children. In Cicchetti, D. & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 647–684). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbarino, J., & Gilliam, G. (1980). Understanding abusive families. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
George, C., & Main, M. (1979). Social interactions of young abused children: Approach, avoidance, and aggression. Child Development, 50, 306–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartup, W. (1983). Peer relations. In Mussen, P. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103–196). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Herrenkohl, R. C., & Herrenkohl, E. C. (1981). Some antecedents and developmental consequences of child maltreatment. In Rizley, R. & Cicchetti, D. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on child maltreatment (pp. 57–76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hoffman-Plotkin, D., & Twentyman, C. (1984). A multimodal assessment of behavioral and cognitive deficits in abused and neglected preschoolers. Child Development, 55, 794–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, C., & Espinosa, M. P. (1985). The consequences of child abuse for the formation of relationships with peers. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, R., & Straker, G. (1982). Peer group interaction of physically abused children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 6, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, C. L., & Hesselbrock, V. (1978). Problem children's adult adjustment predicted from teacher's ratings. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., LaCrosse, J., & Ricks, D. (1972). The predictability of adult mental health from child behavior. In Wolman, B. (Ed.), Manual of child psychopathology (pp. 1217–1284). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1990). Children's relatedness to peers: Attachment beyond infancy and its organization across relationships. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Lynch, M., & Wellborn, J. G. (1989). Patterns of relatedness in maltreated and matched-control children: A look at mother-child relationships beyond infancy in high risk groups. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1984). Predicting rejection of her infant from mother's representation of her own experiences: A preliminary report. International Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect, 8, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents' unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In Greenberg, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, M. (Eds.), Attachment during the preschool years (pp. 161–182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. C. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In Bretherton, I. & Waters, E. (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1–2, Serial No. 209), 66–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of a disorganized disoriented attachment pattern. In Brazelton, T. B. & Yogman, M. W. (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95–124). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In Greenberg, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, M. (Eds.), Attachment during the preschool years (pp. 121–160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Weston, D. (1981). The quality of the toddler's relationship to mother and father. Child Development, 52, 932–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvin, R. S. (1977). An ethological-cognitive model for the attenuation of mother-child attachment behavior. In Alloway, T. M., Krames, L., & Piner, P. (Eds.), Advances in the study of communication and affect, Vol. 3: The development of social attachments (pp. 25–60). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S. (1989). Resilience in development: Implications of the study of successful adaptation for developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology, Vol. 1: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 261–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In Lahey, B. B. & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1–52). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Mellor-Crummey, C. (1989). Social coping in children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Mueller, N., & Silverman, N. (1989). Peer relations in maltreated children. In Cicchetti, D. & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 529–578). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer acceptance and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children “at risk”? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricks, M. H. (1985). The social transmission of parental behavior: Attachment across generations. In Bretherton, I. & Waters, E. (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1–2, Serial No. 209), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieder, C., & Cicchetti, D. (1989). Organizational perspective on cognitive control functioning and cognitive-affective balance in maltreated children. Developmental Psychology, 25, 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, L. N. (1966). Deviant children grown up. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkens.Google Scholar
Roff, M., Sells, B., & Golden, M. M. (1972). Social adjustment and personality development in children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., & Giller, H. (1983). Juvenile delinquency: Trends and perspectives. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (1987). SAS/STA T guide for personal computers, Version 6 Ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schneider-Rosen, K., Braunwald, K., Carlson, V., & Cicchetti, D. (1985). Current perspectives in attachment theory: Illustration from the study of maltreated infants. In Bretherton, I. & Waters, E. (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, (1–2, Serial No. 209), 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider-Rosen, K., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). The relationship between affect and cognition in maltreated infants: Quality of attachment and the development of visual self-recognition. Child Development, 55, 648–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Infant-caregiver attachment and patterns of adaptation in preschool: The roots of maladaptation and competence. In Perlmutter, M. (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 41–81). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1989a). Relationships, self, and individual adaptation. In Sameroff, A. J. & Emde, R. N. (Eds.), Relationship disturbances in early childhood: A developmental approach (pp. 70–96). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1989b). Pathways to adaptation and maladaptation: Psychopathology as developmental deviation. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology, Vol. 1: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 13–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1990). An organizational perspective on the self. In Cicchetti, D. & Beeghly, M. (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 281–308). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., & Fleeson, J. (1986). Attachment and the construction of relationships. In Hartup, W. & Rubin, Z. (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 51–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., & Fleeson, J. (1988). The coherence of family relationships. In Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.), Relationships within families (pp. 27–47). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1989). The representations of relational patterns: Developmental considerations. In Sameroff, A. J. & Emde, R. N. (Eds.), Relationship disturbances in early childhood: A developmental approach (pp. 52–69). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Trickett, P., Aber, J. L., Carlson, V., & Cicchetti, D. (1991). Child rearing characteristics and child development in two samples of physically abusive families. Developmental Psychology, 27, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trickett, P., & Kuczynski, L. (1986). Children's misbehaviors and parental discipline in abusive and nonabusive families. Developmental Psychology, 22, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trickett, P., & Sussman, E. J. (1988). Parental perceptions of childrearing practices in physically abusive and nonabusive families. Developmental Psychology, 24, 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troy, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (1987). Victimization among preschoolers: The role of attachment relationship history. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 26, 166–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vondra, J., Barnett, D., & Cicchetti, D. (1989). Perceived and actual competence among maltreated and comparison school children. Development and Psychopathology, 1, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1987). Manual for the Rochester Assessment Package for Schools. University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Wolfe, D. A. (1985). Child abusive parents: An empirical review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 462–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar