Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:13:23.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the efficacy of the Family Check-Up Online: A school-based, eHealth model for the prevention of problem behavior during the middle school years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2019

Elizabeth A. Stormshak ,
John R. Seeley ,
Allison S. Caruthers ,
Lucia Cardenas ,
Kevin J. Moore ,
Milagra S. Tyler ,
Christopher M. Fleming ,
Jeff Gau  and
Brian Danaher
Elizabeth A. Stormshak*
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
John R. Seeley
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Allison S. Caruthers
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Lucia Cardenas
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Kevin J. Moore
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Milagra S. Tyler
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Christopher M. Fleming
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Jeff Gau
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Brian Danaher
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
*
Author for Correspondence: Elizabeth A. Stormshak, Knight Chair and Professor, 5251, College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; E-mail: bstorm@uoregon.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of a family-centered preventive intervention, the Family Check-Up (FCU), delivered as an online, eHealth model to middle school families. To increase accessibility of family-centered prevention in schools, we adapted the evidence-based FCU to an online format, with the goal of providing a model of service delivery that is feasible, given limited staffing and resources in many schools. Building on prior research, we randomly assigned participants to waitlist control (n = 105), FCU Online as a web-based intervention (n = 109), and FCU Online with coaching support (n = 108). We tested the effects of the intervention on multiple outcomes, including parental self-efficacy, child self-regulation, and child behavior, in this registered clinical trial (NCT03060291). Families engaged in the intervention at a high rate (72% completed the FCU assessment) and completed 3-month posttest assessments with good retention (94% retained). Random assignment to the FCU Online with coaching support was associated with reduced emotional problems for children (p = .003, d = −0.32) and improved parental confidence and self-efficacy (p = .018, d = 0.25) when compared with waitlist controls. Risk moderated effects: at-risk youth showed stronger effects than did those with minimal risk. The results have implications for online delivery of family-centered interventions in schools.

Keywords

at riskeHealthfamily interventionmiddle schoolparenting

Information

Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 31 , Special Issue 5: Honoring the Contributions and Legacy of Thomas Dishion , December 2019 , pp. 1873 - 1886
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atkins, M. S., Hoagwood, K. E., Kutash, K., & Seidman, E. (2010). Toward the integration of education and mental health in schools. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37, 40–47. doi: 0.1007/s10488-010-0299-7Google Scholar
Baker, S., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M., & Morawska, A. (2017). A randomized controlled trial evaluating a low-intensity interactive online parenting intervention, Triple P Online Brief, with parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 91, 78–90. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.01.016Google Scholar
Baumel, A., Pawar, A., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U. (2016). Digital parent training for children with disruptive behaviors: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 26, 740–749. doi:10.1089/cap.2016.0048Google Scholar
Cardamone-Breen, M. C., Jorm, A. F., Lawrence, K. A., Rapee, R. M., Mackinnon, A. J., & Yap, M. B. H. (2018). A single-session, web-based parenting intervention to prevent adolescent depression and anxiety disorders: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Christenson, S. L. (2003). The family–school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 454–482. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.4.454.26995Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Connell, A. M., Dishion, T. J., Yasui, M., & Kavanagh, K. (2007). An adaptive approach to family intervention: Linking engagement in family-centered intervention to reductions in adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 568–579. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.568Google Scholar
Connell, A. M., Stormshak, E. A., Dishion, T. J., Fosco, G. M., & Van Ryzin, M. J. (2018). The Family Check-Up and adolescent depression: An examination of treatment responders and non-responders. Prevention Science, 19, 16–26. doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0586-3Google Scholar
Danaher, B. G., McKay, H. G., & Seeley, J. R. (2005). The information architecture of behavior change websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7, e12. doi:10.2196/jmir.7.2.e12Google Scholar
Danaher, B. G., Milgrom, J., Seeley, J. R., Stuart, S., Schembri, C., Tyler, M. S., … Lewinsohn, P. (2013). MomMoodBooster web-based intervention for postpartum depression: Feasibility trial results. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e242. doi:10.2196/jmir.2876Google Scholar
Danaher, B. G., & Seeley, J. R. (2009). Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 28–39. doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9129-0Google Scholar
Danaher, B. G., Seeley, J. R., Stormshak, E. A., Tyler, M. S., Caruthers, A. S., Moore, K. J., & Cardenas, L. (2018). Family Check-Up Online program for parents of middle school students: Formative development and study design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7, e11106. doi:10.2196/11106Google Scholar
Day, J. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2018). Do parents benefit from help when completing a self-guided parenting program online? A randomized controlled trial comparing Triple P Online with and without telephone support. Behavior Therapy, 49, 1020–1038. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.002Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J. (2011). Promoting academic competence and behavioral health in public schools: A strategy of systemic concatenation of empirically based intervention principles. School Psychology Review, 40, 590–597.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Andrews, D. W. (1995). Preventing escalation in problem behaviors with high-risk young adolescents: Immediate and 1-year outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 538–548. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.4.538Google Scholar
Dishion, T., Forgatch, M. S., Chamberlain, P., & Pelham, W. E. III. (2016). The Oregon model of behavioral family therapy: From intervention design to promoting large-scale system change. Behavior Therapy, 47, 812–837. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.002Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Garbacz, S. A., Seeley, J. R., Stormshak, E. A., Smolkowski, K., Moore, K. J., … Fosco, G. M. (2019). Translational research on an evidence-based parenting support within public schools: Strategies, challenges, and potential solutions. In Garbacz, S. A. (Ed.), Research design and evaluation of tiered family-school partnership programs. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening with adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.755Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). The Family Check-Up with high-risk young adolescents: Preventing early-onset substance use by parent monitoring [Special issue]. Behavior Therapy, 34, 553–571. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(03)80035-7Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Connell, A. M., Gardner, F., Weaver, C. M., & Wilson, M. N. (2008). The Family Check-Up with high-risk indigent families: Preventing problem behavior by increasing parents’ positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Development, 79, 1395–1414. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.xGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Intervening in children's lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. (2011). Everyday parenting: A professional's guide to building family management skills. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, L. K., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). Revision of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (EATQ). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.Google Scholar
Embry, D. D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 75–113. doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0036-xGoogle Scholar
Enebrink, P., Högström, J., Forster, M., & Ghaderi, A. (2012). Internet-based parent management training: A randomized controlled study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.01.006Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 43–53. doi:10.1037/a0014699Google Scholar
Forman, S. G., Olin, S. S., Hoagwood, K. E., Crowe, M., & Saka, N. (2009). Evidence-based interventions in schools: Developer's views of implementation barriers and facilitators. School Mental Health, 1, 26–36. doi:10.1007/s12310-008-9002-5Google Scholar
Fosco, G. M., Frank, J. L., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). Opening the “black box”: Family Check-Up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 455–468. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.001Google Scholar
Fosco, G. M., Seeley, J. R., Dishion, T. J., Smolkowski, K., Stormshak, E. A., Downey-McCarthy, R., … Strycker, L. A. (2014). Lessons learned from scaling up the ecological approach to family interventions and treatment in middle schools. In Weist, M., Lever, N., Bradshaw, C., & Owens, J. (Eds.), Handbook of school mental health, research, training, practice, and policy (2nd ed., pp. 237–251). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Frey, A. J., Cloud, R. N., Lee, J., Small, J. W., Seeley, J. R., Feil, E. G., … Golly, A. (2011). The promise of motivational interviewing in school mental health. School Mental Health, 3, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s12310-010-9048-zGoogle Scholar
Frieden, T. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: The health impact pyramid. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 590–595. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652Google Scholar
Friederichs, S., Bolm, L., Oenema, A., Guyaux, J., & Lechner, L. (2014). Motivational interviewing in a Web-based physical activity intervention with an avatar: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e48. doi:10.2196/jmir.2974Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621–626.Google Scholar
Garbacz, S. A., McIntyre, L. L., & Stormshak, E. A. (2018). The efficacy of the Family Check-Up on children's emotional and behavior problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1063426618806258Google Scholar
Gelatt, V. A., Adler-Baeder, F., & Seeley, J. R. (2010). An interactive web-based program for stepfamilies: Development and evaluation of efficacy. Family Relations, 59, 572–586. doi:10.2307/40929638Google Scholar
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.Google Scholar
Hoagwood, K. E. (2005). Family-based services in children's mental health: A research review and synthesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 690–713. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01451.xGoogle Scholar
Högström, J., Enebrink, P., Melin, B., & Ghaderi, A. (2015). Eighteen-month follow-up of internet-based parent management training for children with conduct problems and the relation of homework compliance to outcome. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46, 577–588. doi:10.1007/s10578-014-0498-7Google Scholar
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In Bambara, L. & Kern, L. (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ingersoll, K. S., Banton, T., Gorlin, E., Vajda, K., Singh, H., Peterson, N., … Cox, D. J. (2015). Motivational interviewing support for a behavioral health Internet intervention for drivers with type 1 diabetes. Internet Interventions, 2, 103–109.Google Scholar
Jensen, P. S., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2008). Improving children's mental health through parent empowerment: A guide to assisting families. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D. J. (2014). Future directions in the design, development, and investigation of technology as a service delivery vehicle. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43, 128–142. doi:10.1080/15374416.2013.859082Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2002). Psychosocial treatments for conduct disorder in children and adolescents. In Nathan, P. E. & Gorman, J. M. (Eds.), A guide to treatments that work (2nd ed., pp. 57–85). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Problem-solving skills training and parent management training for oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. In Weisz, J. R. & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 211–226). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kelders, S. M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. (2013). Participants, usage, and use patterns of a web-based intervention for the prevention of depression within a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e172. doi:10.2196/jmir.2258Google Scholar
Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Poduska, J. M., Ialongo, N. S., Wang, W., Toyinbo, P., … Wilcox, H. C. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependency, 95, S5–S28. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.004Google Scholar
Kling, Å., Forster, M., Sundell, K., & Melin, L. (2010). A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behavior Therapy, 41, 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004Google Scholar
Leijten, P., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., Matthys, W., & Dishion, T. J. (2015). The Family Check-Up and service use in high risk families of young children: Bridging the gap between empirically supported prevention and community-based service. Prevention Science, 16, 397–406. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0479-xGoogle Scholar
Lunkenheimer, E. S., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Gardner, F., M., Wilson, M. N., & Skuban, E. (2008). Collateral benefits of the Family Check-Up on early childhood school readiness: Indirect effects of parents’ positive behavior support. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1737–1752. doi:10.1037/a0013858Google Scholar
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., … Altman, D. G. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ, 340, c869. doi:10.1136/bmj.c869Google Scholar
Mohr, D. C., Cuijpers, P., & Lehman, K. (2011). Supportive accountability: A model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13, e30. doi:10.2196/jmir.1602Google Scholar
Mohr, D. C., Duffecy, J., Ho, J., Kwasny, M., Cai, X., Burns, M. N., & Begale, M. (2013). A randomized controlled trial evaluating a manualized TeleCoaching protocol for improving adherence to a web-based intervention for the treatment of depression. PLOS ONE, 8, e70086. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070086Google Scholar
Moore, K. J., Garbacz, S. A., Gau, J. M., Dishion, T. J., Brown, K. L., Stormshak, E. A., & Seeley, J. R. (2016). Proactive parent engagement in public schools: Using a brief student strengths and needs assessment in a multiple-gating risk management strategy. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 230–240. doi:10.1177/1098300716632590Google Scholar
Noel, A., Stark, P., Redford, J., & Zukerberg, A. (2015). Parent and family involvement in education, from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2012. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Yoerger, K. (2000). Adolescent growth in new forms of problem behavior: Macro- and micro-peer dynamics. Prevention Science, 1, 3–13. doi:10.1023/A:1010019915400Google Scholar
Pelham, W. E., Dishion, T. J., Tein, J. Y., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2017). What doesn't work for whom? Exploring heterogeneity in responsiveness to the Family Check-Up in early childhood using a mixture model approach. Prevention Science, 18, 911–922. doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0805-1Google Scholar
Prinz, R. J., & Dumas, J. E. (2004). Prevention of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in children and adolescents. In Barrett, P. N. & Ollendick, T. H. (Eds.), Handbook of interventions that work with children and adolescents: Prevention and treatment (pp. 475–488). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Prinz, R. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2007). Adopting a population-level approach to parenting and family support interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 739–749. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.005Google Scholar
Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Johnson, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Simons-Rudolph, A., Vincus, A., & Thorne, J. (2003). Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation's middle schools. Health Education & Behavior, 30, 375–391. doi:10.1177/1090198103030003010Google Scholar
Sanchez, A. L., Cornacchio, D., Poznanski, B., Golik, A., Chou, T., & Comer, J. S. (2018). The effectiveness of school-based mental health services for elementary-aged children: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 57, 153–165. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.11.022Google Scholar
Sanders, M. R., Baker, S., & Turner, K. M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of Triple P Online with parents of children with early-onset conduct problems. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 675–684. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.07.004Google Scholar
Sanders, M. R., Dittman, C. K., Farruggia, S. P., & Keown, L. (2014a). A comparison of online versus workbook delivery of a self-help positive parenting program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 35, 125–133, doi:10.1007/s10935-014-0339-2Google Scholar
Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014b). The Triple P-Positive parenting program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, e337–e357. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003Google Scholar
Sanders, M. R., & Woolley, M. L. (2005). The relationship between maternal self-efficacy and parenting practices: Implications for parent training. Child: Care, Health & Development, 31, 65–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00487.xGoogle Scholar
Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2018). Effects of the Family Check-Up on reducing growth in conduct problems from toddlerhood through school age: An analysis of moderated mediation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 856–867. doi:10.1037/ccp0000337Google Scholar
Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Indirect effects of fidelity to the Family Check-Up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 962–974. doi:10.1037/a0033950Google Scholar
Smolkowski, K., Seeley, J. R., Gau, J. M., Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., Moore, K. J., … Garbacz, S. A. (2017). Effectiveness evaluation of the Positive Family Support intervention: A three-tiered public health delivery model for middle schools. Journal of School Psychology, 62, 103–125. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.004Google Scholar
Sourander, A., McGrath, P. J., Ristkari, T., Cunningham, C., Huttunen, J., Lingley-Pottie, P., … Fossum, S. (2016). Internet-assisted parent training intervention for disruptive behavior in 4-year-old children: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 378–387. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3411Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Brown, K. L., Moore, K. J., Dishion, T. J., Seeley, J., & Smolkowski, K. (2016). Going to scale with family-centered, school-based interventions: Challenges and future directions. In Sheridan, S. M. & Kim, E. (Eds.), Family–school partnerships in context (pp. 25–44). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Connell, A., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). An adaptive approach to family-centered intervention in schools: Linking intervention engagement to academic outcomes in middle and high school. Prevention Science, 10, 221–235. doi:10.1007/s11121-009-0131-3Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Connell, A. M., Véronneau, M.-H., Myers, M. W., Dishion, T. J., Kavanagh, K., & Caruthers, A. S. (2011). An ecological approach to promoting early adolescent mental health and social adaptation: Family-centered intervention in public middle schools. Child Development, 82, 209–225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01551.xGoogle Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., DeGarmo, D. D., Chronister, K. M., & Caruthers, A. (2018). The impact of family-centered prevention on self-regulation and subsequent long-term risk in emerging adults. Prevention Science, 19, 549–558. doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0852-7Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). A school-based, family-centered intervention to prevent substance use: The Family Check-Up. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 227–232. doi:10.1080/00952990903005908Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Dishion, T. J., Light, J., & Yasui, M. (2005). Implementing family-centered interventions within the public middle school: Linking service delivery to change in problem behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 723–733. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-7650-6Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Fosco, G. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2010). Implementing interventions with families in schools to increase youth school engagement: The Family Check-Up model. School Mental Health, 2, 82–92. doi:10.1007/s12310-009-9025-6Google Scholar
Turner, K. M. T., & Sanders, M. R. (2013). Triple P Online Brief [5 module interactive internet program]. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Triple P International Pty.Google Scholar
Van Ryzin, M. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Engaging parents in the Family Check-Up in middle school: Longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 627–633. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255Google Scholar
Weist, M. D. (2005). Fulfilling the promise of school-based mental health: Moving toward a public mental health promotion approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 735–741. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-7651-5Google Scholar
Weist, M. D., Youngstrom, E. A., Stephan, S., Lever, N., Fowler, J., Taylor, L., … Hoagwood, K. (2014). Challenges and ideas from a research program on high-quality, evidence-based practice in school mental health. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 244–255. doi:10.1080/15374416.2013.833097Google Scholar
Yap, M. B. H., Mahtani, S., Rapee, R. M., Nicolas, C., Lawrence, K. A., MacKinnon, A., & Jorm, A. F. (2018). A tailored web-based intervention to improve parenting risk and protective factors for adolescent depression and anxiety problems: Postintervention findings from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20, e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.9139Google Scholar
Zubrick, S. R., Silburn, S. R., Garton, A., Burton, P., Dalby, R., Carlton, J., … Lawrence, D. (1995). Developing health and well-being in the nineties. Western Australian Child Health Survey. Perth, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Institute for Child Health Research.Google Scholar