Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-g8tfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:46:25.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The double edge of protective and risk factors for delinquency: Interrelations and developmental patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2009

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber ,
Rolf Loeber ,
David P. Farrington ,
Quanwu Zhang ,
Welmoet van Kammen  and
Eugene Maguin
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber*
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
Rolf Loeber
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
David P. Farrington
Affiliation:
Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University
Quanwu Zhang
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
Welmoet van Kammen
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
Eugene Maguin
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Protective and risk factors were examined in three samples, each of about 500 boys. Cross-sectional analyses examined a large number of independent variables for their potential protective and risk effects on different levels of seriousness of boys' delinquency. The results showed that protective and risk effects often co-occurred in the same variables, that few variables had risk effects only, and none had protective effects oniy. Protective effects were as likely to promote nondelinquency as to suppress serious delinquency, whereas risk effects were as likely to suppress nondelinquency as to promote serious delinquency. Certain variables were mostly associated with distinctions between nondelinquency and minor delinquency, other variables were related to the distinction between minor delinquency and serious delinquency, and a third group of variables was associated with both distinctions. Developmental analyses indicated that the magnitude of protective and risk effects increased with age. Implications of the findings for research and clinical practice are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 683 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1978). The child behavior profile: I. Boys aged 6–11. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 478–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1979). The child behavior profile: II. Boys aged 12–16 and girls aged 6–11 and 12–16. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1987). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and Profile, Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Barnes, H., & Olson, D. H. (1982). Parent adolescent communication. In Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, W. (Eds.), Family inventories (pp. 55–70). St. Paul: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1992). The role of developmental theory in prevention and intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copas, J., & Loeber, R. (1990). Relative improvement over chance for 2 × 2 tables. British Journal of Statistical and Mathematical Psychology, 43, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, A. J. (1987). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Parent Version (unpublished manuscript) (rev.). Worcester: University of Massachusetts Medical Center.Google Scholar
Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (1988). Scales to assess child and adolescent depression: Checklists, screens and nets. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 726–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, E. J., Edelbrock, C., & Costello, A. J. (1985). The validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC): A comparison between pediatric and psychiatric referrals. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelbrock, C., & Achenbach, T. M. (1984). The teacher version of the Child Behavior Profile: I. Boys aged six through eleven. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1992). The challenge of teenage antisocial behavior. Paper prepared for the Marbach Castle Conference Youth in the Year 2000, Mar-bach, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Gallagher, B., Morley, L., st.Leger, R., & West, D. (1988). Are there any successful men from criminogenic backgrounds? Psychiatry, 51, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, D. P., & Hawkins, J. D. (1991). Predicting participation, early onset and later persistence in officially recorded offending. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D., & Loeber, R. (1989). RIOC and Phi as measures of predictive efficiency and strength of association in 2 × 2 tables. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Elliott, D. S., Hawkins, J. D., Kandel, D. B., Klein, M. W., McCord, J., Rowe, D. C., &Tremblay, R. E. (1990). Advancing knowledge about the onset of delinquency and crime. In Lahey, B. B. & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 283–342). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmezy, N. (1985). Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors. In Stevenson, J. E. (Ed.), Recent research in developmental psychopathology (pp. 213–233). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kandel, E., Mednick, S. A., Kirkegaard-Sorenson, L., Hutchings, B., Knop, J., Rosenberg, R., & Schul-singer, F. (1988). IQ as a protective factor for subjects at high risk for antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 224–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loeber, R. (1991). Questions and advances in the study of developmental pathways. In Cicchetti, D. & Toth, S. (Eds.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 3. Models and integrations (pp. 97–115). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., & Le Blanc, M. (1990). Toward a developmental criminology. In Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (Eds.), Crime and justice (pp. 375–473). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, W. B., & Farrington, D. P. (1989). Development of a new measure of self-reported antisocial behavior for young children: Prevalence and reliability. In Klein, M. (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 203–225). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer-Nijhof.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, W. B., & Farrington, D. P. (1991). Initiation, escalation, and desistance in juvenile offending and their correlates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 36–82.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S. (1993). Annotation: Methodological and conceptual issues in research on childhood resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthar, S. S., & Zigler, E. (1992). Intelligence and social competence among high-risk adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae-Grant, N., Thomas, H., Offord, D. R., & Boyle, M. H. (1989). Risk, protective factors, and prevalence of behavioral and emotional disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children's responses to stress and disadvantage. In Kent, M. W. & Rolf, J. E. (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology. HI. Social competence in children (pp. 49–74). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In Rolf, J., Masten, A., Cic-chetti, D., Nuechterlein, K. H., & Weintraub, S. (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of Psychopathology (pp. 181–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., & Thomas, C. (1992). Caretakers seeking help for boys with disruptive and delinquent behavior. Comprehensive Mental Health Care, 2, 159–178.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P., Smith, C., Loeber, R., van Kammen, W. B., Huizinga, D., & Weiher, A. W. (1992). Resilient youth. In Huizinga, D., Loeber, R., & Thornberry, T. P. (Eds.), Urban delinquency and substance abuse: Technical report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (pp. 18/1–18/13). Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science; Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic; and Albany: State University of New York, Hindelang Criminal Justice Center.Google Scholar
van Kammen, W., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1991). Substance use and its relationship to conduct problems and delinquency in young boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
White, J. L., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1989). A prospective replication of protective effects of IQ in subjects at high risk for juvenile delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 719–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed