Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2024
Let  $F$ be a separable integral binary form of odd degree
$F$ be a separable integral binary form of odd degree  $N \geq 5$. A result of Darmon and Granville known as ‘Faltings plus epsilon’ implies that the degree-
$N \geq 5$. A result of Darmon and Granville known as ‘Faltings plus epsilon’ implies that the degree- $N$ superelliptic equation
$N$ superelliptic equation  $y^2 = F(x,z)$ has finitely many primitive integer solutions. In this paper, we consider the family
$y^2 = F(x,z)$ has finitely many primitive integer solutions. In this paper, we consider the family  $\mathscr {F}_N(f_0)$ of degree-
$\mathscr {F}_N(f_0)$ of degree- $N$ superelliptic equations with fixed leading coefficient
$N$ superelliptic equations with fixed leading coefficient  $f_0 \in \mathbb {Z} \smallsetminus \pm \mathbb {Z}^2$, ordered by height. For every sufficiently large
$f_0 \in \mathbb {Z} \smallsetminus \pm \mathbb {Z}^2$, ordered by height. For every sufficiently large  $N$, we prove that among equations in the family
$N$, we prove that among equations in the family  $\mathscr {F}_N(f_0)$, more than
$\mathscr {F}_N(f_0)$, more than  $74.9\,\%$ are insoluble, and more than
$74.9\,\%$ are insoluble, and more than  $71.8\,\%$ are everywhere locally soluble but fail the Hasse principle due to the Brauer–Manin obstruction. We further show that these proportions rise to at least
$71.8\,\%$ are everywhere locally soluble but fail the Hasse principle due to the Brauer–Manin obstruction. We further show that these proportions rise to at least  $99.9\,\%$ and
$99.9\,\%$ and  $96.7\,\%$, respectively, when
$96.7\,\%$, respectively, when  $f_0$ has sufficiently many prime divisors of odd multiplicity. Our result can be viewed as a strong asymptotic form of ‘Faltings plus epsilon’ for superelliptic equations and constitutes an analogue of Bhargava's result that most hyperelliptic curves over
$f_0$ has sufficiently many prime divisors of odd multiplicity. Our result can be viewed as a strong asymptotic form of ‘Faltings plus epsilon’ for superelliptic equations and constitutes an analogue of Bhargava's result that most hyperelliptic curves over  $\mathbb {Q}$ have no rational points.
$\mathbb {Q}$ have no rational points.
 $\mathbb {Q}$ have no rational points, Preprint (2013), arXiv:1308.0395.Google Scholar
$\mathbb {Q}$ have no rational points, Preprint (2013), arXiv:1308.0395.Google Scholar $2$-Selmer group of elliptic curves, Preprint (2021), arXiv:2110.09063.Google Scholar
$2$-Selmer group of elliptic curves, Preprint (2021), arXiv:2110.09063.Google Scholar $F_{q}{X}$, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 294 (1982), 147–150; MR651431.Google Scholar
$F_{q}{X}$, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 294 (1982), 147–150; MR651431.Google Scholar $z^m=F(x,y)$ and
$z^m=F(x,y)$ and  $Ax^p+By^q=Cz^r$, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 27 (1995), 513–543; MR1348707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$Ax^p+By^q=Cz^r$, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 27 (1995), 513–543; MR1348707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $2$-selmer group of a family of non-hyperelliptic curves of genus
$2$-selmer group of a family of non-hyperelliptic curves of genus  $3$, Preprint (2021), arXiv:2008.13158.Google Scholar
$3$, Preprint (2021), arXiv:2008.13158.Google Scholar $p$-adic integers, Amer. Math. Monthly 127 (2020), 519–529; MR4101402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$p$-adic integers, Amer. Math. Monthly 127 (2020), 519–529; MR4101402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $E$, Res. Number Theory 4 (2018), paper no. 21; MR3787911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
$E$, Res. Number Theory 4 (2018), paper no. 21; MR3787911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed $E_8$ and the average size of the 3-Selmer group of the Jacobian of a pointed genus-2 curve, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 122 (2021), 678–723; MR4258170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$E_8$ and the average size of the 3-Selmer group of the Jacobian of a pointed genus-2 curve, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 122 (2021), 678–723; MR4258170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $Cy^d=F(x,z)$, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 20 (2008), 811–828; MR2523319.Google Scholar
$Cy^d=F(x,z)$, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 20 (2008), 811–828; MR2523319.Google Scholar $E_6$ and the arithmetic of a family of non-hyperelliptic curves of genus 3, Forum Math. Pi 3 (2015), e1; MR3298319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$E_6$ and the arithmetic of a family of non-hyperelliptic curves of genus 3, Forum Math. Pi 3 (2015), e1; MR3298319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $n$-ic forms, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 83 (2011), 208–231; MR2763952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$n$-ic forms, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 83 (2011), 208–231; MR2763952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar