Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-9t7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T10:23:47.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammar as Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

J. Lambek
J. Lambek*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While there are a small number of reasonably deep theorems in mathematical linguistics, I wish to argue that grammar is mathematics at a very basic level, albeit "trivial" mathematics. Linguistic activities such as the production and recognition of sentences are quite analogous to the mathematical activities of proving theorems or making calculations, while learning a language involves something akin to the discovery or invention of postulates.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , 01 September 1989 , pp. 257 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1989

References

1. Anglin, W. S., A mathematical analysis of a production grammar, Theoretical Linguistics 13 (1986), 125–138.Google Scholar
2. Bar-Hillel, Y., Perlis, M. and E. Shamir, On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars, Z. Phonetik, Sprachwiss. Kommunikat. 14 (1961), 143–172.Google Scholar
3. Benson, D. B., Syntax and semantics: a categorical view, Information and Control 17 (1970), 145— 160.Google Scholar
4. Benson, D. B., The basic algebraic structures in categories of derivations, Information and Control 28 (1975), 1–29.Google Scholar
5. Bhargava, M. and J. Lambek, A production grammar for Hindi kinship terminology, Theoretical Linguistics 10 (1983), 227–245.Google Scholar
6. Bhargava, M. and Lambek, J., A production grammar for Sanskrit kinship terminology, McGill University Working papers in Cognitive Science 6 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Brainerd, B., Introduction to the mathematics of language study, Elsevier, New York 1971.Google Scholar
8. Buchler, J. R. and Selby, H. A., Kinship and social organization, MacMillan, New York 1968.Google Scholar
9. Chomsky, N., Syntactic structures, Mouton, s'Gravenhage 1957.Google Scholar
10. Chomsky, N., Lectures on government and binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht 1982.Google Scholar
11. Cohn, P. M., Algebra and language theory, Bull. London Math. Soc. 7 (1975), 1–29.Google Scholar
12. Curry, H. B. and Feys, R., Combinatory Logic I, North Holland, Amsterdam 1958.Google Scholar
13. Goodenough, W. H., Yankee kinship terminology: a problem in componential analysis. In: E. A. Hammel (éd.), Formal semantics, American Anthropologist 67 (5) Part 2 (1965), 259–287.Google Scholar
14. Gross, M., Mathematical models in Linguistics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J. 1972.Google Scholar
15. Hotz, G., Eindeutigkeit und Mehrdeutigkeit formaler Sprachen, Elektronische Informationsverarbeitung und Kybernetik 2 (1966), 235–247.Google Scholar
16. Kleene, S. C., Introduction to metamathematics, Van Nostrand, New York 1952.Google Scholar
17. Lambek, J., A mathematician looks at French conjugation, Theoretical Linguistics 2 (1975), 203– 214.Google Scholar
18. Lambek, J., Computability and mathematical linguistics, Notes for Mathematics 180-328, fourth edition, McGill University, Montreal 1976.Google Scholar
19. Lambek, J., A mathematician looks at Latin conjugation, Theoretical Linguistics 6 (1979), 221–224.Google Scholar
20. Lambek, J., A production grammar for English kinship terminology, Theoretical Linguistics, 13 (1986), 19–36.Google Scholar
21. Lambek, J., Production grammars revisited, Proceedings Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam 1987, 175–195.Google Scholar
22. Lambek, J., and M. Lambek, The kinship terminology of Malagasy speakers in Mayotte, Anthropological Linguistics 22 (1981), 154–182.Google Scholar
23. Lounsbury, F. G., Another view of Trobriand kinship categories. In: E. H. Hammel (ed.) Formal semantics, American Anthropologist 67 (5) Part 2 (1965), 142–185.Google Scholar
24. Montague, R., Formal philosphy, selected papers, edited by Thomason, R. H., Yale University Press, New Haven 1974.Google Scholar
25. Webster's New Ideal Dictionary, Merrian Company, Springfield 1973.Google Scholar