No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
For   $S\,\subseteq \,{{\mathbb{R}}^{n}}$  a set
 $S\,\subseteq \,{{\mathbb{R}}^{n}}$  a set   $C\,\subseteq \,S$  is an
 $C\,\subseteq \,S$  is an   $m$ -clique if the convex hull of no
$m$ -clique if the convex hull of no   $m$ -element subset of
 $m$ -element subset of   $C$  is contained in
 $C$  is contained in   $S$ . We show that there is essentially just one way to construct a closed set
 $S$ . We show that there is essentially just one way to construct a closed set   $S\,\subseteq \,{{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}$  without an uncountable 3-clique that is not the union of countably many convex sets. In particular, all such sets have the same convexity number; that is, they require the same number of convex subsets to cover them. The main result follows from an analysis of the convex structure of closed sets in
 $S\,\subseteq \,{{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}$  without an uncountable 3-clique that is not the union of countably many convex sets. In particular, all such sets have the same convexity number; that is, they require the same number of convex subsets to cover them. The main result follows from an analysis of the convex structure of closed sets in   ${{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}$  without uncountable 3-cliques in terms of clopen,
 ${{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}$  without uncountable 3-cliques in terms of clopen,   ${{P}_{4}}$ -free graphs on Polish spaces.
 ${{P}_{4}}$ -free graphs on Polish spaces.