1 Introduction
 Let G be a finite group and let 
 $b_p(G)$
 denote the largest degree of an irreducible Brauer character of G. Recently, Moretó (in [Reference Moretó7, Theorem 2.1]) showed that if G is solvable, then G has an abelian subgroup of index at most
$b_p(G)$
 denote the largest degree of an irreducible Brauer character of G. Recently, Moretó (in [Reference Moretó7, Theorem 2.1]) showed that if G is solvable, then G has an abelian subgroup of index at most 
 ${b_p(G)}^{43/4}$
, and there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that
${b_p(G)}^{43/4}$
, and there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that 
 $|G:A|\leq {b_p(G)}^{43/2}$
. We strengthen this result by considering the irreducible monomial Brauer characters and also improve the bound substantially.
$|G:A|\leq {b_p(G)}^{43/2}$
. We strengthen this result by considering the irreducible monomial Brauer characters and also improve the bound substantially.
 Moretó’s result is motivated by a result of Gluck [Reference Gluck2], who showed that in all finite groups the index of the Fitting subgroup 
 ${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 in G is bounded by a polynomial function of
${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 in G is bounded by a polynomial function of 
 $b(G)$
, where
$b(G)$
, where 
 $b(G)$
 is the largest degree of an irreducible character of G. For a finite solvable group G, Gluck further showed that
$b(G)$
 is the largest degree of an irreducible character of G. For a finite solvable group G, Gluck further showed that 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq b(G)^{13/2}$
; Moretó and Wolf [Reference Moretó and Wolf9] gave the bound
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq b(G)^{13/2}$
; Moretó and Wolf [Reference Moretó and Wolf9] gave the bound 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq b(G)^3$
. As of today, for solvable groups, the best general bound
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq b(G)^3$
. As of today, for solvable groups, the best general bound 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq b(G)^\alpha $
 was given by Yang in [Reference Yang11] with
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq b(G)^\alpha $
 was given by Yang in [Reference Yang11] with 
 $\alpha ={\ln (6\cdot {(24)^{1/3}})}/{\ln 3}\approx 2.595$
.
$\alpha ={\ln (6\cdot {(24)^{1/3}})}/{\ln 3}\approx 2.595$
.
 Let G be a finite solvable group, 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}(G)$
 be the set of irreducible characters of G,
${\operatorname {Irr}}(G)$
 be the set of irreducible characters of G, 
 ${\operatorname {IBr}}(G)$
 be the set of irreducible Brauer characters of G and
${\operatorname {IBr}}(G)$
 be the set of irreducible Brauer characters of G and 
 ${\operatorname {IBr}}_m(G)$
 be the set of irreducible monomial Brauer characters of G. We will write
${\operatorname {IBr}}_m(G)$
 be the set of irreducible monomial Brauer characters of G. We will write 
 $b(G)$
 to denote the largest degree of an ordinary irreducible character of G,
$b(G)$
 to denote the largest degree of an ordinary irreducible character of G, 
 $b_m(G)$
 to denote the largest degree of an irreducible monomial character of G and
$b_m(G)$
 to denote the largest degree of an irreducible monomial character of G and 
 $b_{\textit {mp}}(G)$
 to denote the largest degree of an irreducible monomial Brauer character of G. We write
$b_{\textit {mp}}(G)$
 to denote the largest degree of an irreducible monomial Brauer character of G. We write 
 ${\operatorname {acd}}(G)={\sum _{\chi \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G)}\chi (1)}/{k(G)}$
 to denote the average degree of the irreducible characters of G, where
${\operatorname {acd}}(G)={\sum _{\chi \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G)}\chi (1)}/{k(G)}$
 to denote the average degree of the irreducible characters of G, where 
 $k(G)$
 is the number of conjugacy classes of G. In the same way,
$k(G)$
 is the number of conjugacy classes of G. In the same way, 
 ${\operatorname {acd}}_p(G)$
 denotes the average degree of the irreducible Brauer characters of G.
${\operatorname {acd}}_p(G)$
 denotes the average degree of the irreducible Brauer characters of G.
 For the average degree of the irreducible characters 
 ${\operatorname {acd}}(G)$
, it is not true that the index of the Fitting subgroup is bounded above in terms of
${\operatorname {acd}}(G)$
, it is not true that the index of the Fitting subgroup is bounded above in terms of 
 ${\operatorname {acd}}(G)$
. However, the index of the Fitting subgroup is bounded in terms of the average degree of the irreducible characters of G that lie over a linear character of the Fitting subgroup, and we write
${\operatorname {acd}}(G)$
. However, the index of the Fitting subgroup is bounded in terms of the average degree of the irreducible characters of G that lie over a linear character of the Fitting subgroup, and we write 
 ${\operatorname {acd}}(G|\lambda )={\sum _{\chi \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )}\chi (1)}/{k(G|\lambda )}$
. In [Reference Moretó8], Moretó proved that there exists a linear
${\operatorname {acd}}(G|\lambda )={\sum _{\chi \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )}\chi (1)}/{k(G|\lambda )}$
. In [Reference Moretó8], Moretó proved that there exists a linear 
 $\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 such that
$\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 such that 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {\operatorname {acd}}(G|\lambda )^{\alpha }$
. We consider the irreducible Brauer character analogues for this case.
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {\operatorname {acd}}(G|\lambda )^{\alpha }$
. We consider the irreducible Brauer character analogues for this case.
2 Main results
Theorem 2.1. Let G be a finite solvable group. Then there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that 
 $|G:A|\leq {b_m(G)}^{2\alpha }\cdot b_m({\mathbf {F}}(G))^8$
.
$|G:A|\leq {b_m(G)}^{2\alpha }\cdot b_m({\mathbf {F}}(G))^8$
.
Proof. By [Reference Li, Bian and Zhang5, Theorem 4.1], 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {b_m(G)}^{\alpha }$
. By [Reference Isaacs3, Theorem 12.26], there exists an abelian group
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {b_m(G)}^{\alpha }$
. By [Reference Isaacs3, Theorem 12.26], there exists an abelian group 
 $B\le {\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 such that
$B\le {\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 such that 
 $|{\mathbf {F}}(G):B|\leq {b_m({\mathbf {F}}(G))}^{4}$
 (note that
$|{\mathbf {F}}(G):B|\leq {b_m({\mathbf {F}}(G))}^{4}$
 (note that 
 ${b({\mathbf {F}}(G))=b_m({\mathbf {F}}(G))}$
). Thus,
${b({\mathbf {F}}(G))=b_m({\mathbf {F}}(G))}$
). Thus, 
 $$ \begin{align*}|G:B|=|G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)||{\mathbf{F}}(G):B|\leq {b_m(G)}^{\alpha}\cdot b_m({\mathbf{F}}(G))^4.\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}|G:B|=|G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)||{\mathbf{F}}(G):B|\leq {b_m(G)}^{\alpha}\cdot b_m({\mathbf{F}}(G))^4.\end{align*} $$
Now, by the Chermak–Delgado theorem [Reference Isaacs4, Theorem 1.41], we conclude that G has a characteristic abelian subgroup A such that
 $$ \begin{align*} |G:A|\leq {b_m(G)}^{2\alpha}\cdot b_m({\mathbf{F}}(G))^8.\\[-38pt] \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*} |G:A|\leq {b_m(G)}^{2\alpha}\cdot b_m({\mathbf{F}}(G))^8.\\[-38pt] \end{align*} $$
Corollary 2.2. Suppose that all the irreducible characters of a finite solvable group G have degree at most 
 ${b(G)}$
. Then, there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that
${b(G)}$
. Then, there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that 
 $|G:A|\leq {b(G)}^{2\alpha +8}$
.
$|G:A|\leq {b(G)}^{2\alpha +8}$
.
Lemma 2.3. Let N be a normal subgroup of the finite solvable group G and suppose that there exists a Brauer character 
 $\lambda \in {\operatorname {IBr}}(N)$
 such that
$\lambda \in {\operatorname {IBr}}(N)$
 such that 
 $\lambda (1)=1$
 and
$\lambda (1)=1$
 and 
 $\lambda $
 is G-invariant.
$\lambda $
 is G-invariant. 
- 
(a) Then,  $\lambda $
 is extendible to G if and only if $\lambda $
 is extendible to G if and only if $G'\cap N \leqslant {\operatorname {Ker}}\lambda $
. $G'\cap N \leqslant {\operatorname {Ker}}\lambda $
.
- 
(b) Suppose that  $G=NH$
 and $G=NH$
 and $N\cap H=1$
. Then, $N\cap H=1$
. Then, $\lambda $
 is extendible to G. $\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
Proof. For part (a), we write 
 $\bar {G}=G/{G'}$
. Since
$\bar {G}=G/{G'}$
. Since 
 $N/(G'\cap N)\cong (NG')/{G'}$
 and
$N/(G'\cap N)\cong (NG')/{G'}$
 and 
 $\lambda $
 can be viewed as a character in
$\lambda $
 can be viewed as a character in 
 $N/(G'\cap N)$
, we have
$N/(G'\cap N)$
, we have 
 $\bar {\lambda } \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(NG'/{G'})$
. The group
$\bar {\lambda } \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(NG'/{G'})$
. The group 
 $\bar {G}=G/{G'}$
 is abelian, so
$\bar {G}=G/{G'}$
 is abelian, so 
 $\bar {\lambda }$
 is extendible to
$\bar {\lambda }$
 is extendible to 
 $\bar {G}$
 and it follows that
$\bar {G}$
 and it follows that 
 $\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
$\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
For part (b), we write
 $$ \begin{align*}\chi : {N}\rightarrow {{\mathbb{F}}}^*\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}\chi : {N}\rightarrow {{\mathbb{F}}}^*\end{align*} $$
for a module representation of 
 $\lambda $
 which affords
$\lambda $
 which affords 
 $\chi $
. For
$\chi $
. For 
 $g\in G$
, let
$g\in G$
, let 
 $g=ah$
, where
$g=ah$
, where 
 $a\in N$
 and
$a\in N$
 and 
 $h\in H$
. We define
$h\in H$
. We define 
 $$ \begin{align*}\tilde{\chi}(g)=\chi(a)\in {{\mathbb{F}}}^*.\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}\tilde{\chi}(g)=\chi(a)\in {{\mathbb{F}}}^*.\end{align*} $$
We can calculate directly that
 $$ \begin{align*} \tilde{\chi}(ah\cdot a'h')&=\tilde{\chi}(ah\cdot a'\cdot hh^{-1}\cdot h') =\tilde{\chi}(a\cdot ha'h^{-1}\cdot hh')\\ &=\chi(a\cdot ha'h^{-1}) =\chi(a)\cdot \chi (ha'h^{-1})\\ &=\chi(a)\cdot \chi (a') =\tilde{\chi}(ab)\cdot \tilde{\chi}(a'h'). \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*} \tilde{\chi}(ah\cdot a'h')&=\tilde{\chi}(ah\cdot a'\cdot hh^{-1}\cdot h') =\tilde{\chi}(a\cdot ha'h^{-1}\cdot hh')\\ &=\chi(a\cdot ha'h^{-1}) =\chi(a)\cdot \chi (ha'h^{-1})\\ &=\chi(a)\cdot \chi (a') =\tilde{\chi}(ab)\cdot \tilde{\chi}(a'h'). \end{align*} $$
Thus, 
 $\tilde {\chi }$
 is an extension of
$\tilde {\chi }$
 is an extension of 
 $\chi $
 and it follows that
$\chi $
 and it follows that 
 $\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
$\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
The following result strengthens [Reference Moretó7, Theorem 2.1].
Theorem 2.4. Let G be a finite solvable group and suppose that 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
. Then,
${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
. Then, 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {b_{\textit {mp}}(G)}^{\alpha }$
. Also, there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {b_{\textit {mp}}(G)}^{\alpha }$
. Also, there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that 
 $|G:A|\leq {b_{\textit {mp}}(G)}^{2\alpha }\cdot b_{\textit {mp}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))^8$
.
$|G:A|\leq {b_{\textit {mp}}(G)}^{2\alpha }\cdot b_{\textit {mp}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))^8$
.
Proof. Let 
 $\bar {G} := G/{\mathbf {F}}(G)$
. Since
$\bar {G} := G/{\mathbf {F}}(G)$
. Since 
 ${\mathbf {F}}(G/\Phi (G))= {\mathbf {F}}(G)/\Phi (G)$
, we may assume that
${\mathbf {F}}(G/\Phi (G))= {\mathbf {F}}(G)/\Phi (G)$
, we may assume that 
 $\Phi (G)=1$
. Thus,
$\Phi (G)=1$
. Thus, 
 ${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 is abelian. Now, G splits over the abelian normal subgroup
${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 is abelian. Now, G splits over the abelian normal subgroup 
 ${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
. Also,
${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
. Also, 
 ${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 is a faithful and completely reducible
${\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 is a faithful and completely reducible 
 $\bar {G}$
-module by Gaschütz’s theorem [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Theorem 1.12]. By [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Proposition 12.1],
$\bar {G}$
-module by Gaschütz’s theorem [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Theorem 1.12]. By [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Proposition 12.1], 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 is a faithful and completely reducible
${\operatorname {Irr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 is a faithful and completely reducible 
 $\bar {G}$
-module. Since
$\bar {G}$
-module. Since 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
, we have
${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
, we have 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))={\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
, and thus
${\operatorname {Irr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))={\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
, and thus 
 ${\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 is a faithful and completely reducible
${\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 is a faithful and completely reducible 
 $\bar {G}$
-module. By [Reference Yang11, Theorem 3.4], there exists
$\bar {G}$
-module. By [Reference Yang11, Theorem 3.4], there exists 
 $\beta \in {\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 such that
$\beta \in {\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 such that 
 $|\bar {G}|\le |{\bar {G}}:{\bar {I}}|^{\alpha }$
, where
$|\bar {G}|\le |{\bar {G}}:{\bar {I}}|^{\alpha }$
, where 
 $\bar {I}=I_{\bar {G}} (\beta )=\{\bar {g}\in \bar {G} \ |\ \beta ^{\bar {g}}=\beta \}$
. Let I be the preimage of
$\bar {I}=I_{\bar {G}} (\beta )=\{\bar {g}\in \bar {G} \ |\ \beta ^{\bar {g}}=\beta \}$
. Let I be the preimage of 
 $\bar {I}$
 in G and
$\bar {I}$
 in G and 
 $I=I_G (\beta )=\{g\in G \ |\ \beta ^g=\beta \}$
. By Lemma 2.3, let
$I=I_G (\beta )=\{g\in G \ |\ \beta ^g=\beta \}$
. By Lemma 2.3, let 
 $\widehat {\beta } \in {\operatorname {IBr}} (I|\beta )$
 be an extension of
$\widehat {\beta } \in {\operatorname {IBr}} (I|\beta )$
 be an extension of 
 $\beta $
 and consider
$\beta $
 and consider 
 $\chi :={\widehat {\beta }}^G\in {\operatorname {IBr}}_m(G)$
. Then,
$\chi :={\widehat {\beta }}^G\in {\operatorname {IBr}}_m(G)$
. Then, 
 $$ \begin{align*}|G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)|=|\bar{G}|\le |{\bar{G}}:{\bar {I}}|^{\alpha}=|G:I|^{\alpha}\le {\chi}(1)^{\alpha}\le {b_{\textit{mp}}(G)}^{\alpha}.\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}|G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)|=|\bar{G}|\le |{\bar{G}}:{\bar {I}}|^{\alpha}=|G:I|^{\alpha}\le {\chi}(1)^{\alpha}\le {b_{\textit{mp}}(G)}^{\alpha}.\end{align*} $$
By [Reference Isaacs3, Theorem 12.26], there exists an abelian group 
 $B\le {\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 such that
$B\le {\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 such that 
 $|{\mathbf {F}}(G):B|\leq {b({\mathbf {F}}(G))}^{4}$
. Since
$|{\mathbf {F}}(G):B|\leq {b({\mathbf {F}}(G))}^{4}$
. Since 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
, we have
${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
, we have 
 $b({\mathbf {F}}(G))=b_p({\mathbf {F}}(G))=b_{\textit {mp}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
. Thus,
$b({\mathbf {F}}(G))=b_p({\mathbf {F}}(G))=b_{\textit {mp}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
. Thus, 
 $$ \begin{align*} |G:B|=|G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)||{\mathbf{F}}(G):B|\leq {b_{\textit{mp}}(G)}^{\alpha}\cdot b_{\textit{mp}}({\mathbf{F}}(G))^4. \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*} |G:B|=|G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)||{\mathbf{F}}(G):B|\leq {b_{\textit{mp}}(G)}^{\alpha}\cdot b_{\textit{mp}}({\mathbf{F}}(G))^4. \end{align*} $$
By the Chermak–Delgado theorem [Reference Isaacs4, Theorem 1.41], we conclude that G has a characteristic abelian subgroup A such that
 $$ \begin{align*} |G:A|\leq {b_{\textit{mp}}(G)}^{2\alpha}\cdot b_{\textit{mp}}({\mathbf{F}}(G))^8.\\[-38pt] \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*} |G:A|\leq {b_{\textit{mp}}(G)}^{2\alpha}\cdot b_{\textit{mp}}({\mathbf{F}}(G))^8.\\[-38pt] \end{align*} $$
Corollary 2.5. Suppose that all the irreducible p-Brauer characters of a finite solvable group G have degree at most 
 ${b_{p}(G)}$
 and
${b_{p}(G)}$
 and 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
. Then, there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that
${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
. Then, there exists a characteristic abelian subgroup A of G such that 
 $|G:A|\leq {b_{p}(G)}^{2\alpha +8}$
.
$|G:A|\leq {b_{p}(G)}^{2\alpha +8}$
.
Theorem 2.6. Let G be a finite solvable group such that 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
. Then, there exists a linear
${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
. Then, there exists a linear 
 $\lambda \in {\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 such that
$\lambda \in {\operatorname {IBr}}({\mathbf {F}}(G))$
 such that 
 $|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {\operatorname {acd}}_p(G|\lambda )^{\alpha }$
.
$|G:{\mathbf {F}}(G)|\leq {\operatorname {acd}}_p(G|\lambda )^{\alpha }$
.
Proof. By Gaschütz’s theorem [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Theorem 1.12], 
 $\bar {G}=G/{\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 acts faithfully and completely reducibly on
$\bar {G}=G/{\mathbf {F}}(G)$
 acts faithfully and completely reducibly on 
 $V={\mathbf {F}}(G)/\Phi (G)$
. By [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Proposition 12.1],
$V={\mathbf {F}}(G)/\Phi (G)$
. By [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Proposition 12.1], 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}(V)$
 is a faithful and completely reducible
${\operatorname {Irr}}(V)$
 is a faithful and completely reducible 
 $\bar {G}$
-module. Since
$\bar {G}$
-module. Since 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
, we have
${\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)=1$
, we have 
 $p\nmid |{\mathbf {F}}(G)|$
 and
$p\nmid |{\mathbf {F}}(G)|$
 and 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}(V)={\operatorname {IBr}}(V)$
. Applying [Reference Yang11, Theorem 3.4] to this action, we deduce that there exists
${\operatorname {Irr}}(V)={\operatorname {IBr}}(V)$
. Applying [Reference Yang11, Theorem 3.4] to this action, we deduce that there exists 
 ${\lambda \in {\operatorname {IBr}}(V)}$
 such that
${\lambda \in {\operatorname {IBr}}(V)}$
 such that 
 $$ \begin{align*}|\bar{G}|\leq |G:I_{G}(\lambda)|^{\alpha}.\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}|\bar{G}|\leq |G:I_{G}(\lambda)|^{\alpha}.\end{align*} $$
By Clifford’s correspondence [Reference Navarro10, Theorem 8.9], all the characters in 
 ${\operatorname {IBr}}(G|\lambda )$
 are induced from irreducible Brauer characters of
${\operatorname {IBr}}(G|\lambda )$
 are induced from irreducible Brauer characters of 
 $I_G(\lambda )$
. In particular, if
$I_G(\lambda )$
. In particular, if 
 $\chi \in {\operatorname {IBr}}(G|\lambda )$
, then
$\chi \in {\operatorname {IBr}}(G|\lambda )$
, then 
 $$ \begin{align*}|\bar{G}|\leq |G:I_{G}(\lambda)|^{\alpha}\leq \chi(1)^{\alpha}.\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}|\bar{G}|\leq |G:I_{G}(\lambda)|^{\alpha}\leq \chi(1)^{\alpha}.\end{align*} $$
It follows that
 $$ \begin{align*} |G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)|\leq {\operatorname{acd}}_p(G|\lambda)^{\alpha}.\\[-34pt] \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*} |G:{\mathbf{F}}(G)|\leq {\operatorname{acd}}_p(G|\lambda)^{\alpha}.\\[-34pt] \end{align*} $$
 As usual, if G is a group, then 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G)$
 is the largest normal
${\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G)$
 is the largest normal 
 $p'$
-subgroup of G. We define
$p'$
-subgroup of G. We define 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p' p}(G)$
 to be the subgroup of G such that
${\mathbf {O}}_{p' p}(G)$
 to be the subgroup of G such that 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p' p}(G)/{\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G)={\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G/{\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G))$
. If
${\mathbf {O}}_{p' p}(G)/{\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G)={\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G/{\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G))$
. If 
 $N\unlhd G$
 and
$N\unlhd G$
 and 
 $\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(N)$
, we write
$\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(N)$
, we write 
 $C_G(\lambda )$
 to be the inertia subgroup in G of
$C_G(\lambda )$
 to be the inertia subgroup in G of 
 $\lambda $
. We write
$\lambda $
. We write 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}_{mp'}(G)$
 to be the set of all the irreducible monomial
${\operatorname {Irr}}_{mp'}(G)$
 to be the set of all the irreducible monomial 
 $p'$
-degree characters of G and
$p'$
-degree characters of G and 
 $b_{mp'}(G)$
 to be the largest degree of the irreducible characters in
$b_{mp'}(G)$
 to be the largest degree of the irreducible characters in 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}_{mp'}(G)$
.
${\operatorname {Irr}}_{mp'}(G)$
.
Lemma 2.7 [Reference Moretó7, Lemma 3.1].
 Let 
 $G=NH$
, where
$G=NH$
, where 
 $N\unlhd G$
 and
$N\unlhd G$
 and 
 $N\cap H=1$
. If
$N\cap H=1$
. If 
 $\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(N)$
 is linear and G-invariant, then
$\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(N)$
 is linear and G-invariant, then 
 $\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
$\lambda $
 is extendible to G.
Lemma 2.8. Let 
 $G=HV$
, where
$G=HV$
, where 
 $V\unlhd G$
 is an elementary abelian p-group,
$V\unlhd G$
 is an elementary abelian p-group, 
 $H\cap V=1$
, and H acts faithfully and completely reducibly on V. Then,
$H\cap V=1$
, and H acts faithfully and completely reducibly on V. Then, 
 $|{\mathbf {F}}(H)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^2$
.
$|{\mathbf {F}}(H)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^2$
.
Proof. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of H and let 
 $F={\mathbf {F}}(H)$
. Set
$F={\mathbf {F}}(H)$
. Set 
 $K=PF$
. We note that K acts faithfully on V, so
$K=PF$
. We note that K acts faithfully on V, so 
 ${\mathbf {F}}(KV)=V$
. This implies that K acts faithfully and completely reducibly on
${\mathbf {F}}(KV)=V$
. This implies that K acts faithfully and completely reducibly on 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}(V)$
. By [Reference Dolfi and Navarro1, Theorem 1.1], there exists a P-invariant
${\operatorname {Irr}}(V)$
. By [Reference Dolfi and Navarro1, Theorem 1.1], there exists a P-invariant 
 $\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(V)$
 such that
$\lambda \in {\operatorname {Irr}}(V)$
 such that 
 $|F:C_F(\lambda )|\geq \sqrt {|F|}$
. Clifford’s correspondence implies that if
$|F:C_F(\lambda )|\geq \sqrt {|F|}$
. Clifford’s correspondence implies that if 
 $\widehat {\lambda }\in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )$
, then
$\widehat {\lambda }\in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )$
, then 
 ${\widehat {\lambda }(1)\geq \sqrt {|F|}}$
.
${\widehat {\lambda }(1)\geq \sqrt {|F|}}$
.
 By Lemma 2.7, 
 $\lambda $
 can be extended to
$\lambda $
 can be extended to 
 $C_G(\lambda )$
. Since
$C_G(\lambda )$
. Since 
 $P\leq C_G(\lambda )$
, by using Clifford’s correspondence again, all the characters in
$P\leq C_G(\lambda )$
, by using Clifford’s correspondence again, all the characters in 
 ${\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )$
 are induced from irreducible characters of
${\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )$
 are induced from irreducible characters of 
 $C_G(\lambda )$
. We deduce that there exists a
$C_G(\lambda )$
. We deduce that there exists a 
 $p'$
-degree character
$p'$
-degree character 
 $\widehat {\lambda }\in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )$
. Then, we have a
$\widehat {\lambda }\in {\operatorname {Irr}}(G|\lambda )$
. Then, we have a 
 $p'$
-degree character
$p'$
-degree character 
 $\chi :=\widehat {\lambda }^{G}\in {\operatorname {Irr}}_m(G)$
 and
$\chi :=\widehat {\lambda }^{G}\in {\operatorname {Irr}}_m(G)$
 and 
 $\chi (1)\geq \sqrt {|F|}$
. Hence,
$\chi (1)\geq \sqrt {|F|}$
. Hence, 
 $$ \begin{align*}\sqrt{|F|}\leq \chi(1)\leq b_{mp'}(G). \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}\sqrt{|F|}\leq \chi(1)\leq b_{mp'}(G). \end{align*} $$
Thus, we deduce that 
 $|{\mathbf {F}}(H)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^2$
.
$|{\mathbf {F}}(H)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^2$
.
Theorem 2.9. Let G be a solvable group. Then, 
 $|G:{\mathbf {O}}_{p',p}(G)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^{13/2}$
.
$|G:{\mathbf {O}}_{p',p}(G)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^{13/2}$
.
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that 
 ${\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G)=1$
. We write
${\mathbf {O}}_{p'}(G)=1$
. We write 
 ${V={\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)}$
 and note that V is the Fitting subgroup G. By Gaschütz’s theorem, we may assume that
${V={\mathbf {O}}_{p}(G)}$
 and note that V is the Fitting subgroup G. By Gaschütz’s theorem, we may assume that 
 $\Phi (G)=1$
, so that V is elementary abelian. We write
$\Phi (G)=1$
, so that V is elementary abelian. We write 
 $G=HV$
 with
$G=HV$
 with 
 ${H\cap V=1}$
 and note that H acts faithfully and completely reducibly on V. Let
${H\cap V=1}$
 and note that H acts faithfully and completely reducibly on V. Let 
 $F={\mathbf {F}}(H)$
. Then,
$F={\mathbf {F}}(H)$
. Then, 
 $|{\mathbf {F}}(H)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^2$
 by Lemma 2.8.
$|{\mathbf {F}}(H)|\leq b_{mp'}(G)^2$
 by Lemma 2.8.
 From [Reference Manz and Wolf6, Theorem 3.5], 
 $|H:F|\leq |F|^{9/4}$
, and thus
$|H:F|\leq |F|^{9/4}$
, and thus 
 $$ \begin{align*} |H|=|H:F||F|\leq |F|^{13/4}\leq b_{mp'}(G)^{13/2}. \\[-34pt] \end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*} |H|=|H:F||F|\leq |F|^{13/4}\leq b_{mp'}(G)^{13/2}. \\[-34pt] \end{align*} $$
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
