Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T17:22:40.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Variability Phonetic Training enhances second language lexical processing: evidence from online training of French learners of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2020

Gerda Ana Melnik Open the ORCID record for Gerda Ana Melnik [Opens in a new window]  and
Sharon Peperkamp
Gerda Ana Melnik*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure – PSL University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Vilnius University, Akademijos str. 4, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania
Sharon Peperkamp
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure – PSL University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
*
Address for correspondence: Gerda Ana Melnik, Email: gerda.ana.melnik@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

High-Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT) has been shown to be effective in improving the perception of the hardest non-native sounds. However, it remains unclear whether such training can enhance phonological processing at the lexical level. The present study tested whether HVPT also improves word recognition. Late French learners of English completed eight online sessions of HVPT on the perception of English word-initial /h/. This sound does not exist in French and has been shown to cause difficulty both at the prelexical (Mah, Goad & Steinhauer, 2016) and the lexical level of processing (Melnik & Peperkamp, 2019). In pretest and posttest participants were administered a prelexical identification task and a lexical decision task. Results demonstrate that after training the learners’ accuracy improved in both tasks. Moreover, these improvements were retained four months after posttest. This is the first evidence that short training can enhance not only prelexical perception, but also word recognition.

Keywords

second language acquisitionlexical processingword recognitionspeech perceptionphonetic training

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 497 - 506
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bradlow, AR (2008) Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /r/-/l/ contrast. In Edwards, J. G. H. & Zampini, M. L. (eds), Phonology and second language acquisition, pp. 287–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, ME, Kristensen, K, van Benthem, KJ, Magnusson, A, Berg, CW, Nielsen, A, Skaug, HJ, Maechler, M and Bolker, BM (2017) glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. The R Journal 9, 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M and New, B (2009) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41, 977–90. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlet, A and Cebrian, J (2015) Identification vs. discrimination training: Learning effects for trained and untrained sounds. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (eds), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. http://www.icphs2015.info/pdfs/proceedings.html (retrieved April 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Cooper, A and Wang, Y (2011) The influence of tonal awareness and musical experience on tone word learning. In Lee, W.S. & Zee, E (eds), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong, SAR, China, pp. 512–515.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, JR (2015) jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods 47, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, B, Mitterer, H, Broersma, M and Sebastián-Gallés, N (2012) Individual differences in late bilinguals’ L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-phonetic analysis to lexical access. Learning and Individual Differences 22, 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenon, I, Kubota, M and Sheppard, C (2019) The creation of a new vowel category by adult learners after adaptive phonetic training. Journal of Phonetics 72, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, V, Sennema, A, Iba, M and Faulkner, A (2005) Effect of audio- visual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication 47, 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homa, D and Cultice, J (1984) Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 10, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000250Google Scholar
Huensch, A and Tremblay, A (2015) Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics 52, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvalson, EM, Barr, AM and Wong, PC (2013) Poorer Phonetic Perceivers Show Greater Benefit in Phonetic-Phonological Speech Learning. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 56, 1045. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0024 )CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, P and Evans, B (2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126, 866–877. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, P, Hazan, V and Bannister, K (2005) Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 3267–3278. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2062307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P, Pinet, M and Evans, BG (2012) Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics 33, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, YH and Hazan, V (2010) Individual variability in the perceptual learning of L2 speech sounds and its cognitive correlates. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K, Wrembel, M & Kul, M (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. Poznań, Poland, pp. 251–256.Google Scholar
Lecumberri, MLG, Cooke, M and Cutler, A (2010) Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: a review. Speech Communication 52, 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, AH and Lyster, R (2016) Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language Learning 66, 809–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengeris, A and Hazan, V (2010) The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 3757–3768. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3506351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leong, CXR, Price, JM, Pitchford, NJ and van Heuven, WJB (2018) High variability phonetic training in adaptive adverse conditions is rapid, effective, and sustained. PLOS ONE 13, e0204888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204888CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lively, SE, Logan, JS and Pisoni, DB (1993) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, 1242–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lively, SE, Pisoni, DB, Yamada, RA, Tokhura, Y and Yamada, T (1994) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96, 2076–2087. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, JS, Lively, SE and Pisoni, DB, (1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mah, J, Goad, H and Steinhauer, K (2016) Using event-related brain potentials to assess perceptibility: The case of French speakers and English [h]. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCandliss, BD, Fiez, JA, Protopapas, A, Conway, M and McClelland, JL (2002) Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.2.89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnik, GA and Peperkamp, S (2019) Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 145, EL13– EL18 https://doi.org/:10.1121/1.5085648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okuno, T and Hardison, DM (2016) Perception-production link in L2 Japanese vowel duration: Training with technology. Language Learning & Technology 20, 61–80.Google Scholar
Pallier, C, Bosch, L and Sebastián-Gallés, N (1997) A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 64, B9–B17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00030-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C, Colomé, A and Sebastián-Gallés, N (2001) The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries. Psychological Science 12, 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pichora-Fuller, MK, Schneider, BA and Daneman, M (1995) How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T, MacKay, IR and Flege, JE (2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D and Luce, P (1987) Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition 25, 21–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90003-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadakata, M and McQueen, JM (2014) Individual aptitude in Mandarin lexical tone perception predicts effectiveness of high-variability training. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, M and Moorman, C (2018) Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics 39, 187–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N (2005) Cross-language speech perception. In Pisoni, DB & Remez, RE (eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 546–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinohara, Y and Iverson, P (2018) High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/–/l/. Journal of Phonetics 66, 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W (2011) Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics 39, 456–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W and Shafer, VL (2008) Speech perception in late second language learners: the re-education of selective perception. In Zampini, M & Hansen, J (eds), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminen, H, Peltola, MS, Kujala, T and Näätänen, R (2015) Phonetic training and non-native speech perception — New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology 97, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Jongman, A and Sereno, JA (2003) Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113, 1033–1043. http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.1531176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Spence, M, Jongman, A and Sereno, J (1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 3649–3658. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, A and Cutler, A (2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, JF and Logan, JS (1985) Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 37, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, JF and Tees, RC (1984) Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75, 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.39098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, EJ, Titone, D, Genesee, F and Steinhauer, K (2017) Phonological processing in late second language learners: The effects of proficiency and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20, 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Kuhl, PK, Imada, T, Iverson, P, Pruitt, J, Stevens, EB, Kawakatsu, M, Tohkura, Y and Nemoto, I (2009) Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: A magnetoencephalography study. NeuroImage 46, 226–240. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Melnik and Peperkamp supplementary material

Melnik and Peperkamp supplementary material

Download Melnik and Peperkamp supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 207.8 KB