Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T21:46:03.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explicit and implicit aptitude effects on second language speech learning: Scrutinizing segmental and suprasegmental sensitivity and performance via behavioural and neurophysiological measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

KAZUYA SAITO ,
HUI SUN  and
ADAM TIERNEY
KAZUYA SAITO*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Linguistics and Communication, Birkbeck College, University of London
HUI SUN
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Linguistics and Communication, Birkbeck College, University of London
ADAM TIERNEY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London
*
Address for correspondence: Kazuya Saito, Birkbeck College, University of London, Department of Applied Linguistics and Communication, Room 334, 25 Russell Square, London, United KingdomWC1B 5DQk.saito@bbk.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study examines the role of cognitive and perceptual individual differences (i.e., aptitude) in second language (L2) pronunciation learning, when L2 learners’ varied experience background is controlled for. A total of 48 Chinese learners of English in the UK were assessed for their sensitivity to segmental and suprasegmental aspects of speech on explicit and implicit modes via behavioural (language/music aptitude tests) and neurophysiological (electroencephalography) measures. Subsequently, the participants’ aptitude profiles were compared to the segmental and suprasegmental dimensions of their L2 pronunciation proficiency analyzed through rater judgements and acoustic measurements. According to the results, the participants’ segmental attainment was associated not only with explicit aptitude (phonemic coding), but also with implicit aptitude (enhanced neural encoding of spectral peaks). Whereas the participants’ suprasegmental attainment was linked to explicit aptitude (rhythmic imagery) to some degree, it was primarily influenced by the quality and quantity of their most recent L2 learning experience.

Keywords

Cognitive individual differencessecond language speechpronunciationexplicit aptitudeimplicit aptitude

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , November 2019 , pp. 1123 - 1140
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This study was funded by the Birkbeck College Additional/Seed Research Fund.

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000895

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language learning, 59, 249–306.Google Scholar
Aiken, S. J., & Picton, T. W. (2008). Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds. Hearing research, 245, 35–47.Google Scholar
Anderson, S., Skoe, E., Chandrasekaran, B., & Kraus, N. (2010). Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4922–4926.Google Scholar
Anvari, S., Trainor, L., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. (2002). Relations among musical skills, phonological processing, and early reading ability in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 111–130.Google Scholar
Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T., & Krishnan, A. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 23, 425–434.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.Google Scholar
Boersma, D., & Weenink, P. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer version 6.0.29. Retrieved from http://www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A.-F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30, 159–175.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns. In Hansen, J. & Zampini, M. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287–308). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Broersma, M. (2012). Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and cognitive processes, 27 (7-8), 1205–1224.Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R., Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433–461.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Training, research, and education (pp. 131–151). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern language aptitude test.Google Scholar
Cason, N., Astésano, C., & Schön, D. (2015). Bridging music and speech rhythm: rhythmic priming and audio-motor training affect speech perception. Acta Psychologica, 155, 43–50.Google Scholar
Coffey, E. B., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016). Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG. Nature communications, 7.Google Scholar
Daltrozzo, J., & Schön, D. (2009). Conceptual processing in music as revealed by N400 effects on words and musical targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1882–1892.Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Mora, J. C., & Daidone, D. (2016). The role of inhibitory control in second language phonological processing. Language Learning, 66, 741–773.Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C. L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63–72.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63, 52–67.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 1–16.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42, 476–490.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. M., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.Google Scholar
Diaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., Escera, C., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2016). Variability in L2 phonemic learning originates from speech-specific capabilities: An MMN study on late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 955–970.Google Scholar
Doelling, K., Arnal, L., Ghitza, O., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. NeuroImage, 85, 761–768.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J., Campbell, S. G., Mislevy, M. A., Bunting, M. F., Bowles, A. R., & Koeth, J. T. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 10–31). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
EIKEN Foundation of Japan. (2016). EIKEN Pre-1 level: Complete questions collection. Tokyo: Oubunsha.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics. 27, 1–24.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (2016, June). The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. Plenary address delivered at New Sounds, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Bohn, O-S., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161–1173.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of non-native speech. Language Learning, 34, 65–89.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. E. (1995). Manual: Musical Aptitude Profile. Chicago: GIA Publications.Google Scholar
Gottfried, T. L. (2007). Music and language learning: Effect of musical training on learning L2 speech contrasts. In Bohn, O.-S. and Munro, M. J. (Eds.) Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 221–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665– 703.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343.Google Scholar
Hornickel, J., Knowles, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children. Hearing research, 284, 52–58.Google Scholar
Ingvalson, E. M., McClelland, J. L., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Predicting native English-like performance by native Japanese speakers. Journal of phonetics, 39, 571–584.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505.Google Scholar
Kormos, J. (2014). Speech production and second language acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Krizman, J., Slater, J., Skoe, E., Marian, V., & Kraus, N. (2015). Neural processing of speech in children is influenced by extent of bilingual experience. Neuroscience letters, 585, 48–53.Google Scholar
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 167–196.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801–842.Google Scholar
Li, M., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Perception practice, production practice, and musical ability in L2 Mandarin tone-word learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 593–620.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High-Level Language Proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566.Google Scholar
Liu, F., Patel, A., Fourcin, A., & Stewart, L. (2010). Intonation processing in congenital amusia: discrimination, identification and imitation. Brain, 133, 1682–1693.Google Scholar
Major, R. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In Edwards, J. Hansen & Zampini, M. (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). Llama language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Meyer, L., Henry, M., Gaston, P., Schmuck, N., & Friederici, A. (2017) Linguistic bias modulates interpretation of speech via neural delta-band oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 27, 4293–4302.Google Scholar
Milovanov, R., Pietilä, P., Tervaniemi, M., & Esquef, P. A. (2010). Foreign language pronunciation skills and musical aptitude: A study of Finnish adults with higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 56–60.Google Scholar
Mora, J. C., & Valls‐Ferrer, M. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 610–641.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2014). Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics, 35, 418–440.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2014). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35, 463–482.Google Scholar
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479–502.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Y. (2009). Developing a music aptitude test for school children in Asia. CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
Omote, A., Jasmin, K., & Tierney, A. (2017). Successful non-native speech perception is linked to frequency following response phase consistency. Cortex, 93, 146–154.Google Scholar
Patel, A., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M., & Holcomb, P. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 717–733.Google Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (2011). Investigating native and non-native vowels produced in conversational speech. In Wrembel, M., Kul, M. & Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010 (pp. 195–205). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Power, A., Colling, L., Mead, N., Barnes, L., & Goswami, U. (2016). Neural encoding of the speech envelope by children with developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 160, 1–10.Google Scholar
Russo, N. M., Skoe, E., Trommer, B., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., Bradlow, A., & Kraus, N. (2008). Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 1720–1731.Google Scholar
Rvachew, S., & Grawburg, M. (2006). Correlates of phonological awareness in preschoolers with speech sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 74–87.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2013). Age effects on late bilingualism: The production development of /ɹ/ by high-proficiency Japanese learners of English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 546–562.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2015). Experience effects on the development of late second language learners' oral proficiency. Language Learning, 65, 563–595.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2017). Effects of sound, vocabulary and grammar learning aptitude on adult second language speech attainment in foreign language classrooms. Language Learning, 67, 665–693.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (in press). The role of aptitude in second language segmental learning: The case of Japanese learners’ English /ɹ/ pronunciation attainment in classroom settings. Applied Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Suzukida, Y., & Sun, H. (2018). Aptitude, experience and second language pronunciation proficiency development in classroom settings: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263117000432Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Brajot, F. (2013). Scrutinizing the role of length of residence and age of acquisition in the interlanguage pronunciation development of English /ɹ/ by late Japanese bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 847–863.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2016). Developing second language oral ability in foreign language classrooms: The role of the length and focus of instruction and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 813–840.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439– 462.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 15–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skoe, E., Krizman, J., Anderson, S., & Kraus, N. (2013). Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1415– 1426.Google Scholar
Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675–681.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–790.Google Scholar
Tierney, A., & Kraus, N. (2013). The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 14981–14988.Google Scholar
Tierney, A., & Kraus, N. (2016). Getting back on the beat: links between auditory-motor integration and precise auditory processing at fast time scales. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43, 782–791.Google Scholar
Tierney, A. T., Krizman, J., Kraus, N., & Tallal, P. (2015). Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 10062–10067.Google Scholar
Tierney, A., White-Schwoch, T., MacLean, J., & Kraus, N, (2017). Individual differences in rhythm skills: links with neural consistency and linguistic ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 855–868.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.Google Scholar
Underbakke, M., Polka, L., Gottfried, T. L., & Strange, W. (1988). Trading relations in the perception of /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 90–100.Google Scholar
White-Schwoch, T., Carr, K. W., Thompson, E. C., Anderson, S., Nicol, T., Bradlow, A. R., & Kraus, N. (2015). Auditory processing in noise: A preschool biomarker for literacy. PLoS biology, 13, e1002196.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature neuroscience, 10, 420.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 239–263.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Grañena, G. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 147–161.Google Scholar
Zhu, L., Bharadwaj, H., Xia, J., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. (2013). A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 384–395.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Saito et al. supplementary material

Appendices A-C

Download Saito et al. supplementary material(File)
File 676.9 KB