Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-26T12:43:09.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and lexical recognition task*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2015

ALICE FOUCART ,
ELISA RUIZ-TADA  and
ALBERT COSTA
ALICE FOUCART*
Affiliation:
Center for Brain and Cognition, University Pompeu Fabra, carrer Roc Boronat, 138, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
ELISA RUIZ-TADA
Affiliation:
Center for Brain and Cognition, University Pompeu Fabra, carrer Roc Boronat, 138, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
ALBERT COSTA
Affiliation:
Center for Brain and Cognition, University Pompeu Fabra, carrer Roc Boronat, 138, 08018 Barcelona, Spain ICREA, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. Alice Foucart Universitat Pompeu Fabra Department of Technology (room 55116) Roc Boronat, 138, 08018 BarcelonaSpainalfoucart@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension. French–Spanish late bilinguals were presented with high-constrained Spanish sentences. ERPs were time-locked on the article preceding the critical noun, which was muted to avoid overlapping effects. Articles that mis-matched the gender of the expected nouns triggered a negativity. A subsequent lexical recognition task revealed that words expected from the context were (falsely) recognised significantly more often than unexpected words, even though all were muted. Overall, the results suggest that anticipation processes are at play during L2 speech processing, and allow creating a memory trace of a word prior to presentation.

Keywords

L2 speech processinganticipation processeslexical recognitionERPstop-down processing

Information

Type
Research Notes
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 213 - 219
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Government (PSI2011-23033, CONSOLIDER-INGENIO2010 CSD2007-00048, ECO2011-25295, and ECO2010-09555-E), from the Catalan Government (SGR 2009-1521), from the 7th Framework Programme (AThEME 613465) and from the Grup de Recerca en Neurociència Cognitiva (GRNC) -2014SGR1210.

References

Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (7), 390–8. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35 (4), 1029–40. doi:10.1037/a0015901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). It's the way that you, er, say it: hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105 (3), 658–68. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (2002). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. In Altmann, G. (Ed.), Psycholinguistics: Critical concepts in psychology (pp. 115–135). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8 (8), 1117–21. doi:10.1038/nn1504 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, I., & Indefrey, P. (2009). Lexical Competition in Nonnative Speech Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1165–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can Bilinguals See It Coming? Word Anticipation in L2 Sentence Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1461–9.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A. (2015). How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30 (6), 768–780. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1016047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 360 (1456), 815–36. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervais-Adelman, A., Pefkou, M., & Golestani, N. (2014). Bilingual speech-in-noise: neural bases of semantic context use in the native language. Brain and Language, 132, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperberg, G. R., Paczynski, M., & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing causal coherence across sentences: an ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 (5), 1230–46. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21452 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2012). The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (03), 508–517. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, E. F., Holcomb, P., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 (3), 484–502. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00328 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacGregor, L. J., Corley, M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2010). Listening to the sound of silence: disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners. Neuropsychologia, 48 (14), 3982–92. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (4), 574–588. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarra, J., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Hearing lips in a second language: visual articulatory information enables the perception of second language sounds. Psychological Research, 71 (1), 4–12. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0031-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 106, 226–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otten, M., Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). Great expectations: specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 89. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-8-89 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paczynski, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language, 67 (4), 426–448. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-Based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12 (6), 445–9. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760129 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rugg, M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Wells, T. (1995). Word and nonword repetition within- and across-modality: an event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 (2), 209–27. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.209 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SanMiguel, I., Widmann, A., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N., & Schröger, E. (2013). Hearing silences: human auditory processing relies on preactivation of sound-specific brain activity patterns. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33 (20), 8633–9. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5821-12.2013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 (3), 443–67. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 (2), 394–417. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10093207 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32 (11), 3665–78. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-11.2012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Xiang, J., Vannest, J., Holroyd, T., Narmoneva, D., Horn, P., Liu, Y., Rose, D., deGrauw, T., & Holland, S. (2011). Neuromagnetic measures of word processing in bilinguals and monolinguals. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 122 (9), 1706–17. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346 (3), 165–168. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: an event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 39 (3), 483–508. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3392191&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 (7), 1272–88. doi:10.1162/0898929041920487 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Foucart supplementary material

Foucart supplementary material 1

Download Foucart supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 93.5 KB