Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T15:00:58.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applied Behaviour Analysis and Normalization: New Carts for Old Horses? A Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Steve Baldwin
Steve Baldwin
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychologist, General Hospital, St. Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands. Visiting Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, Polytechnic Southwest.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

True rapprochement attempts should be welcomed as initiatives to promote understanding between different theoretical positions and in the interest of parsimony. Persuasion attempts to achieve behaviour change, based on the moral imperative, should be inspected very closely indeed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 305 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aanes, D. and Haagenson, L. (1978). Normalization: attention to a conceptual disaster Mental Retardation, 16(1), 55–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, S. (1985). Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: Impact of normalisation teaching on human services and service providers. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 8(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, S. (1990). Normalisation: The Hidden Agenda.(in prep.).Google Scholar
Baldwin, S. and Stowers, C. (1987). Normalization and elderly persons: In whose best interests? American Archives of Rehabilitation Therapy. Spring, 34–42.Google Scholar
Burns, J. and Roberts, T. (1988). A feminist perspective on the normalisation principle.Paper presented at British Psychological Society Conference, University of Leeds,Leeds.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. and McGill, P. (1989). Normalization and applied behaviour analysis: Values and technology in services for people with learning difficulties. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 17, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, L. (1977). Normalization and related concepts: Words and ambiguities. Child Welfare, 56(5), 301–310.Google ScholarPubMed
Ni Ong, B. (1984). Voluntary Organisations and Thatcher's Policies: An Overlap in Ideologies.Paper presented at BSA Medical Sociology Conference. University of Sheffield,Sheffield.Google Scholar
Powell-Lawton, M. (1986). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1982). Mental Retardation and Society: the Ethics and Policies of Normalization Ethics, 93, (October), 81–101.Google Scholar
Wetherby, B. and Baumeister, A. A. (1981). Mental Retardation, In Handbook of Clinical Behavior Therapy. Turner, S. M.Calhoun, K. S. and Adams, H. E. (Eds). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21(6), 234–239.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolfensberger, W. (1988). Human Service Policies: The Rhetoric Versus the Reality.Paper presented at Disability, Handicap and Policy Conference. Bristol Polytechnic,Bristol.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.