Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-kbpd8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-18T19:32:35.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(Temporal) Visual Attention NOT in Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Paul Edmund Dux Open the ORCID record for Paul Edmund Dux [Opens in a new window] ,
Roberto Dell’Acqua  and
Bradley Wyble
Paul Edmund Dux*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia paul.e.dux@gmail.com
Roberto Dell’Acqua
Affiliation:
University of Padova, Padova, PD, Italy dar@unipd.it
Bradley Wyble
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States bpw10@psu.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extensive research using the attentional blink phenomenon illustrates, through behavioural, modelling and cognitive neuroscience approaches, that distinct selection and attention capacity limits exist. Crucially, these effects cannot reflect peripheral visual processes nor distinct task operations across conditions controlling for issues raised by Rosenholtz. Moving away from attention and selection concepts hinder rather than facilitate a mechanistic understanding of vision.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e139
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S. M. S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control. Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dux, P. E., & Harris, I. M. (2007). Viewpoint costs occur during consolidation: Evidence from the attentional blink. Cognition, 101, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 1683–1700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 296–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 509–522.Google ScholarPubMed
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849–860.Google Scholar
Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: Sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 787–807.Google ScholarPubMed