Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-zntvd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-12T13:58:15.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new algorithm of human attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Ilker Yildirim Open the ORCID record for Ilker Yildirim [Opens in a new window]  and
Mario Belledonne
Ilker Yildirim*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA ilker.yildirim@yale.edu mario.belledonne@yale.edu
Mario Belledonne*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA ilker.yildirim@yale.edu mario.belledonne@yale.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do our goals continually impact perceptual processing? The answer could arise from a computational specification of perception in terms of visual tasks, or perhaps several mechanisms operating over specific contexts. Here, we suggest an alternative: adaptive computation, a new algorithmic account of attention that rations the general resource of perceptual computations according to their impact on decision making.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e131
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Belledonne, M., Butkus, E., Scholl, B.J., & Yildirim, I. (2025). Adaptive computation as a new mechanism of dynamic human attention. Psychological Review. Advanced online publication. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rev0000572.Google Scholar
Bruce, N. D., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2005). Saliency based on information maximization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 18, 155–162.Google Scholar
He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1997). Attentional resolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(3), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, L., Mo, L., & Liu, Y. (2012). Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38 (2), 414–428.Google ScholarPubMed
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Nobre, A. C., & Ede, F. van. (2023). Attention in flux. Neuron, 111 (7), 971–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pashler, H. (1997). The psychology of attention. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5677.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, M., Zhu, X., Lu, Y. Y., Scheuer, L. S., Passell, E., Huang, G. C., Germine, L. T., & Horowitz, T. S. (2021). How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6, 1–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsotsos, J. K., Liu, Y., Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., Pomplun, M., Simine, E., & Zhou, K. (2005). Attending to visual motion. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 100 (12), 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar