Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T11:58:32.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intrinsic cost of cognitive control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2013

Wouter Kool  and
Matthew Botvinick
Wouter Kool
Affiliation:
Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540. wkool@princeton.edu www.wouterkool.com matthewb@princeton.edu www.princeton.edu/~matthewb
Matthew Botvinick
Affiliation:
Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540. wkool@princeton.edu www.wouterkool.com matthewb@princeton.edu www.princeton.edu/~matthewb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kurzban and colleagues carry forward an important contemporary movement in cognitive control research, tending away from resource-based models and toward a framework focusing on motivation or value. However, their specific proposal, centering on opportunity costs, appears problematic. We favor a simpler view, according to which the exertion of cognitive control carries intrinsic subjective costs.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 697 - 698
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(5):1252–65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Tice, D. M. (2007) The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(6):351–55.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M. M., Huffstetler, S. & McGuire, J. T. (2009) Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 9(1):16–27. doi:10.3758/CABN.9.1.16.Google Scholar
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C. & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010a) Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136(4):495–525. doi:10.1037/a0019486.Google Scholar
Inzlicht, M. & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012) What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(5):450–63. doi:10.1177/1745691612454134.Google Scholar
Job, V., Dweck, C. S. & Walton, G. M. (2010) Ego depletion – Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science 21(11):1686–93.Google Scholar
Kool, W. & Botvinick, M. M. (in press) A labor/leisure trade-off in cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.Google Scholar
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B. & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139(4):665–82. doi:10.1037/a0020198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Wang, G. J. & Botvinick, M. M. (2013) Neural and behavioral evidence for an intrinsic cost of self-control, PLOS ONE 8(8): e72626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, J. T. & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) Prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, and the registration of decision costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107(17):7922–26.Google Scholar