Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-p5c6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-20T02:22:35.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

40 ms matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Dock H. Duncan  and
Jan Theeuwes Open the ORCID record for Jan Theeuwes [Opens in a new window]
Dock H. Duncan
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands D.H.Duncan@vu.nl Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Amsterdam, Netherlands j.theeuwes@psy.vu.nl
Jan Theeuwes*
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands D.H.Duncan@vu.nl Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Amsterdam, Netherlands j.theeuwes@psy.vu.nl William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitario, Lisbon, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rosenholtz (2024) dismisses attentional capture, arguing that brief distractions (20–40 ms) are insignificant or intentional. However, we argue that distractions are never intentional nor negligible, and studying them is crucial both theoretically and for real-world applications.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e138
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adam, K. C., Yang, Z., & Serences, J. T. (2024). First encounters: Estimating the initial magnitude of attentional capture. Visual Cognition, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenholtz, R. (2024). Visual attention in crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 76, 251–273.Google Scholar
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theeuwes, J. (2021). Self-explaining roads: What does visual cognition tell us about designing safer roads? Cognitive research: principles and implications, 6(1), 15.Google ScholarPubMed
Theeuwes, J. (2025). Attentional capture and control. Annual Review of Psychology, 76(Volume 76, 2025), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-011624-025340 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9(5), 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1595.Google ScholarPubMed