Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:59:40.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biologically inspired visual sensing and flight Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. L. Barrows ,
J. S. Chahl  and
M. V. Srinivasan
G. L. Barrows
Affiliation:
Centeye Washington, USA
J. S. Chahl
Affiliation:
Australian National University Canberra, Australia
M. V. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Australian National University Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is increased interest in new classes of mini- and micro-UAVs with sizes ranging from one metre to ten centimetres. Many envisioned applications of such UAVs require them to be able to fly close to the ground in complex environments. The difficulties associated with flying in such environments coupled with the reduced payload capacity of such airframes means that new methods of sensing and control need to be considered. Good models for such methods are found in the world of flying insects. One particular visual cue used by insects is optic flow, which is the apparent visual motion seen by the insect as a result of its motion through the environment. This paper discusses several research efforts aimed at developing new sensing and control algorithms inspired by insect vision and flight behaviors. These efforts are part of DARPA's controlled biological and biomimetic systems (CBBS) programme. In these (and related) efforts, many elegant control stratagems have been discovered which suggest that simple reflexive schemes combined with the measurement of optic flow may be sufficient to provide many aspects of autonomous navigation in complex environments. Furthermore, these efforts are implementing these behaviors in real flying UAV platforms by using novel hardware and software to measure optic flow, and inserting optic flow measurements into a control loop using a combination of ‘best engineering approaches’ with inspiration taken from biology. This has resulted in fixed and rotary-wing mini-UAVs that are able to hold an altitude and perform terrain following.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1069 , March 2003 , pp. 159 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Gibson, J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, 1950 Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
2. Private communication between authors and Dickinson, M.H. Google Scholar
3. Dickinson, M. Laboratory website, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Integrative Biology, http://socrates.berkeley.edu/∼fly-manmd/ Google Scholar
4. Tammero, L.F. and Dickinson, M.H. The influence of visual landscape on the free flight behavior of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, J Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, pp 327–343.Google Scholar
5. Srinivasan, M.V., Leherer, M. and Kirchner, W.M. and Zhang, S.W. Range Perception Through Apparent Image Speed in Freely Flying Honeybees, Visual Neuroscience, 1991, 6, pp 519–535.Google Scholar
6. Srinivasan, M.V., Zhang, S.W., Leherer, M. and Collett, T.S. Honeybee navigation en-route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry, J Experimental Biology, 1996, Special Issue on Navigation, Vol. 199 (1), pp 237–244.Google Scholar
7. Srinivasan, M.V., Zhang, S.W., Chahl, J.S., Berth, E. and Venkatesh, S. How honeybees make grazing landings on flat surfaces, Biological Cybernetics, 83, pp 171–183.Google Scholar
8. Lee, D.N. A Theory of visual control based on information about time-to-collision, Perception, 1976, 5, pp 437–459.Google Scholar
9. Hengstenberg, R. Multisensory control in Insect oculomotor systems, in visual motion and its role in the stabilisation of gaze, 5, Reviews of Oculomotor Research, 1993, pp 285–298.Google Scholar
10. Srinivasan, M.V. An image interpolation technique for the computation of optic flow and egomotion, Biological Cybernetics, 1994, 71, pp 401–415.Google Scholar
11. Barrows, G.L. Mixed-Mode VLSI Optic Flow Sensors for Micro Air Vehicles, PhD Dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland at College Park, December 1999.Google Scholar
12. Millers, K.T. and Barrows, G.L. Feature tracking linear optic flow sensor chip, proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS'99), Orlando, FL, pp V116–V119, 1999.Google Scholar
13. Harrison, R. and Koch, C., A Robust Analog VLSI Reichardt motion sensor, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 24, pp 213–229 Google Scholar
14. Kramer, J., Sarpeshkar, R. and Koch, C. Pulse-based analog VLSI velocity Sensors, IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems: analog and digital signal processing, 1997, 44, pp 86–101.Google Scholar
15. Stance, G. and Howard, J. An ocellar dorsal light response in a dragonfly, J Experimental Biology, 1979, 83, pp 351–355.Google Scholar
16. Chahl, J.S. and Srinivasan, M.V. Reflective surfaces for panoramic imaging, applied optics, 1997, 36 (31), pp 8275–8285.Google Scholar
17. Chahl, J.S. and Srinivasan, M.V. Filtering and processing of panoramic images obtained using a camera and a wide-angle-imaging reflective surface, J Optical Society of America A, 17, (7), pp 1172–1176,2000.Google Scholar
18. Srinivasan, M.V., Chahl, J.S., Weber, K., Nagle, M.G., and Zhang, S.W. Robot navigation inspired by principles of insect systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 1999, 26, pp 203–216.Google Scholar
19. Chahl, J.S. and Srinivasan, M.V. A complete panoramic vision system incorporating imaging, ranging, and three-dimensional navigation, proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Omnidirectional Imagers. 2000, pp 104–111.Google Scholar
20. Barrows, G., Neely, C. and Miller, K.T. Optic flow sensors for MAV navigation, Chapter 26, in Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications, 195, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, 2001.Google Scholar
21. Private communication between authors and Fearing, R.S. and Dickinson, M.H Google Scholar
22. Fearing, R.S., Chiang, K.H., Dickinson, M.H., Pick, D.L., Sitti, M. and Yan, J. Wing transmission for a micromechanical flying insect, proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April 2000.Google Scholar
23. Sitti, M., Pzt actuated four-bar mechanism with two flexible links for micromechanical flying insect thorax, proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul Korea, May 2001.Google Scholar