Element contents
Strengths and Weaknesses of Two Theories for Explaining 15 Universal Sex Differences in Cognition and Behavior
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 August 2025
Summary
Social role theory and evolutionary neuroandrogenic (ENA) theory are compared regarding how well they can explain 15 cognitive and behavioral sex differences that appear to be present in all human cultures. In essence, social role theory argues that, except for males being larger and more muscular and only females being able to bear children, cognitive and behavioral differences between the sexes result from sociocultural training and expectations. On the other hand, ENA theory attributes sex differences in cognition and behavior to evolved differential exposure of male and female brains to sex hormones, especially testosterone. The existence of 15 nearly certain universal sex differences in cognitive and behavioral traits was documented in a recently published book based on findings from over 40,000 empirical studies. This Element documents that, while both theories have explanatory power, ENA theory surpasses social role theory in explaining the universality of most of the 15 traits.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009581028Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 September 2025
References
Akkuş, M., & Avşar, P. A. (2024). 2D:4D ratio, alexithymia, impulsivity, aggression, and ADHD in men with opioid and methamphetamine use disorders: A comparative analysis with healthy controls. Early Human Development, 189,105946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aleman, A., Bronk, E., Kessels, R. P., Koppeschaar, H. P., & van Honk, J. (2004). A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 612–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alnourani, A., Osman, A., & Alsheikh, A. (2017). Testosterone and homicide (An African perspective). International Journal of Mental Health Psychiatry 3(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2471, 4372.Google Scholar
Angelov, N. & Karimi, A. (2012). Mothers’ income recovery after childbearing, Working Paper, No. 2012:20, Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU). Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Carré, J. M., & Dreber, A. (2015). Testosterone and economic risk taking: A review. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1, 358–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Gray, P. B., et al. (2011). Androgens and competitiveness in men. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, J. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94, 1381–1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archibald, G. C. (1967). Refutation or comparison? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 17, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnocky, S., Albert, G., Carré, J. M., & Ortiz, T. L. (2018). Intrasexual competition mediates the relationship between men’s testosterone and mate retention behavior. Physiology & Behavior, 186, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asherson, P. (2005). Clinical assessment and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 5(4), 525–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auyeung, B., Knickmeyer, R., Ashwin, E., et al. (2012). Effects of fetal testosterone on visuospatial ability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auyeung, B., Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2013). Prenatal and postnatal hormone effects on the human brain and cognition. European Journal of Physiology, 465, 557–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auyeung, T. W., Lee, J. S. W., Kwok, T., et al. (2011). Testosterone but not estradiol level is positively related to muscle strength and physical performance independent of muscle mass: A cross-sectional study in 1489 older men. European Journal of Endocrinology, 164, 811–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aycinena, D., Baltaduonis, R., & Rentschler, L. (2014). Risk preferences and prenatal exposure to sex hormones for ladinos. PLoS One, 9, e103332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babinski, L. M., Hartshough, C. S., Lambert, N. M. (2001). A comparison of self-report of criminal involvement and official arrest records. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 44–54.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. D., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S., Eckel, C. C., & Heracleous, M. (2010). Risk aversion and physical prowess: Prediction, choice, and bias. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41, 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barack, D. L., Ludwig, V. U., Parodi, F., et al. (2022). Attention deficits linked with proclivity to explore while foraging. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nyvjq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Lutchmaya, S., & Knickmeyer, R. (2006). Prenatal testosterone in mind: Amniotic fluid studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Batalova, J. A., & Cohen, P. N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 64, 743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckley, A. L., Kuja-Halkola, R., Lundholm, L., Långström, N., & Frisell, T. (2014). Association of height and violent criminality: Results from a Swedish total population study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, 835–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beltz, A. M., Swanson, J. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2011). Gendered occupational interests: Prenatal androgen effects on psychological orientation to Things versus People. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 313–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A., & Bernath, L. (1997). Resources, attractiveness, family commitment: Reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology, 103, 681–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berenbaum, S. A., Korman, K., & Leveroni, C. (1995). Early hormones and sex differences in cognitive abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, I. (1994). Comparative advantage in self-employment and paid work. Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhasin, S., Woodhouse, L., Casaburi, R., et al. (2001). Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 281, E1172–E1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bijleveld, E., & Baalbergen, J. (2017). Prenatal exposure to testosterone (2D:4D) and social hierarchy together predict voice behavior in bankers. PLoS One, 12, e0180008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, R. H., & Tucker, B. W. (1941). Nestsanitation. British Birds, 34, 206–215, 226–235, 250–255.Google Scholar
Bönte, W., Procher, V. D., Urbig, D., & Voracek, M. (2017). Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts self-reported measures of general competitiveness, but not behavior in economic experiments. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 238, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, A., Carver, K., & Granger, D. A. (2000). Biosocial perspectives on the family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1018–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific explanation a study of the function of theroy, probability and law in science. Cambridge: CUP Archive.Google Scholar
Brañas-Garza, P., Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2018). Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D:4D): Evidence from a large, systematic study. International Economic Review, 59, 1131–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuning, L. G. (2018). Stimulating dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, and endorphin by learning how they are stimulated in animals. Journal of Medical and Clinical Research Review, 2, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R., Blake, K., & Fromhage, L. (2022). Effects of gender inequality and income inequality on within-sex mating competition under hypergyny. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43, 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.1008.1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, K. R. (2006). Evolved sex differences and occupational segregation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buriticá-Marín, E. D., Daza-Arana, J. E., Jaramillo-Losada, J., Riascos-Zuñiga, A. R., & Ordoñez-Mora, L. T. (2023). Effects of a physical exercise program on the physical capacities of older adults: A quasi-experimental study. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2007). The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 502–512.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2017). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. In Interpersonal development (pp. 297–325). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bütikofer, A., Figlio, D. N., Karbownik, K., Kuzawa, C. W., & Salvanes, K. G. (2019). Evidence that prenatal testosterone transfer from male twins reduces the fertility and socioeconomic success of their female co-twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 6749–6753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camara, B., Padoin, C., & Bolea, B. (2022). Relationship between sex hormones, reproductive stages and ADHD: A systematic review. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 25, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, B. C., Dreber, A., Apicella, C. L., et al. (2010). Testosterone exposure, dopaminergic reward, and sensation-seeking in young men. Physiology & Behavior, 99, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cashdan, E. (1995). Hormones, sex, and status in women. Hormones and Behavior, 29, 354–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casto, K. V., & Edwards, D. A. (2016). Testosterone, cortisol, and human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 82, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cebrián, I., & Moreno, G. (2015). The effects of gender differences in career interruptions on the gender wage gap in Spain. Feminist Economics, 21, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celec, P., Ostatníková, D., & Hodosy, J. (2015). On the effects of testosterone on brain behavioral functions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 12–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In Cheng, J. T. & Tracy, J. L. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B. (1991). The evolution of sex chromosomes. Science, 251(4997), 1030–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, E. K., & Ahn, H.-K. (2020). Muscling my way to my positive future: Physical exertion of strength and preference for risk. Asia Marketing Journal, 22, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coates, J. M., & Herbert, J. (2008). Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105, 6167–6172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coates, J. M., Gurnell, M., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen-Bendahan, C. C., Van De Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 353–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordain, L., Gotshall, R. W., & Eaton, S. B. (1998). Physical activity, energy expenditure and fitness: An evolutionary perspective. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 19, 328–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covington, S. S., & Bloom, B. E. (2003). Gendered justice: Women in the Criminal Justice System. In Bloom, B. E. (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders (pp. 1–20). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, N. E., & Harootyan, R. (1975). Demography of the aged. In Woodruff, D. & Birren, J. E. (Eds.), Aging: Scientific perspectives and social issues. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Dabbs, J. M., & Dabbs, M. G. (2000). Heroes, rogues, and lovers: Testosterone and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dabbs, J. M., La Rue, D., & Williams, P. M. (1990). Testosterone and occupational choice: Actors, ministers, and other men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1261–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M. (2017). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dariotis, J. K., Schen, F. R., & Granger, D. A. (2016). Latent trait testosterone among 18-24-year-olds: Methodological considerations and risk associations. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 67, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davis, E. P., & Pfaff, D. (2014). Sexually dimorphic responses to early adversity: implications for affective problems and autism spectrum disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J. T. M., & Hines, M. (2020). How large are gender differences in toy preferences? A systematic review and meta-analysis of toy preference research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene, with a new introduction by the author. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Bruin, I., Verheij, F., MA, T. W., & Ferdinand, R. F. (2006). Differences in finger length ratio between males with autism, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified, ADHD, and anxiety disorders. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 48, 962–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, F. H., Eerland, M. J., & Van De Poll, N. E. (1986). The influence of estrogen, testosterone and progesterone on partner preference, receptivity and proceptivity. Physiology & behavior, 37(6), 885–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2023). Ideological bias in the psychology of sex and gender. In Frisby, C. L., Redding, R. E., O’Donohue, W. T., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (Eds.), Ideological and political bias in psychology: Nature, scope, and solutions (pp. 743–778). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, P. F., Maya-Rosero, E., Franco, M., Montoya-Oviedo, N., Guatibonza, R., & Mockus, I. (2020). Testosterone and homicide: Neuroendocrine aspects of aggression. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 68, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Quinto, A., Hospido, L., & Sanz, C.. (2021). The child penalty: Evidence from Spain. Journal of the Spanish Economic Association,12, 585–606.Google Scholar
Dixson, A. F. (2009). Sexual selection and the origins of human mating systems. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 1380–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social role. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2005). Universal sex differences across patriarchal cultures ≠ evolved psychological dispositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 2, 458–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 340–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, 12(174), 123–173.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004). Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition, 91, 221–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenegger, C., Kumsta, R., Naef, M., Gromoll, J., & Heinrichs, M. (2017). Testosterone and androgen receptor gene polymorphism are associated with confidence and competitiveness in men. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eler, N. (2018). The correlation between right hand finger ratio (2D:4D) and the parameters of anthropometric and physical fitness in children. Journal of Human Sciences, 15, 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L. (1994). The high and the mighty among man and beast: How universal is the relationship between height (or body size) and social status? In Ellis, L. (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality, volume 2: Reproductive and interpersonal aspects of dominance and status (pp. 93–112). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ellis, L. (2001). The biosocial female choice theory of social stratification. Social Biology, 48, 297–319.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, L. (2003). Genes, criminality, and the evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. In Walsh, A. & Ellis, L. (Eds.), Biosocial criminology: Challenging environmentalism’s supremacy (pp. 13–34). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Ellis, L. (2005). A theory explaining biological correlates of criminality. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L. (2006). Gender differences in smiling: An evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. Physiology & Behavior, 88, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, L. (2011). Evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory and universal gender differences in cognition and behavior. Sex Roles, 64, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L. (2022a). Improving scientific communication by altering citation and referencing methods. Journal of Social Science Studies, 9(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L. (2022b). Citing without referencing and two other ways to reduce errors in scientific communication. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 13, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L., Hershberger, S., Field, E., et al. (2008). Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, L., & Hoskin, A. W. (2015). The evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory of criminal behavior expanded. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L., Hoskin, A. W., & Ratnasingam, M. (2018). Handbook of social status correlates. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ellis, L., Farrington, D. P., & Hoskin, A. W. (2019). Handbook of crime correlates, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, L., Palmer, C. T., Hopcroft, R., & Hoskin, A. W. (2024a). The handbook of sex differences Volume I Basic biology. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ellis, L., Palmer, C. T., Hopcroft, R., & Hoskin, A. W. (2024b). The handbook of sex differences Volume II Cognitive variables. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ellis, L., Palmer, C. T., Hopcroft, R., & Hoskin, A. W. (2024c). The handbook of sex differences Volume III Behavioral variables. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ellis, L., Palmer, C. T., Hopcroft, R., & Hoskin, A. W. (2024d). The handbook of sex differences Volume IV Identifying universal sex differences. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
England, P. (2005). Gender inequality in labor markets: The role of motherhood and segregation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12, 264–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K. L., & Hampson, E. (2014). Does risk-taking mediate the relationship between testosterone and decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task? Personality and Individual Differences, 61, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evertsson, M. (2014). Gender ideology and the sharing of housework and child care in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 927–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, G., Hawes, D. J., Frick, P. J., et al. (2019). Conduct disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fales, M. R., Frederick, D. A., Garcia, J. R., et al. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Finley, B., Kalwij, A., & Kapteyn, A. (2022). Born to be wild: Second-to-fourth digit length ratio and risk preferences. Economics & Human Biology, 47, 101178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromonteil, S., Marie-Orleach, L., Winkler, L., & Janicke, T. (2023). Sexual selection in females and the evolution of polyandry. PLoS Biology, 21(1), e3001916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galiano, V., Solazzo, G., Rabinovici, J., et al. (2021). Cord blood androgen levels of females from same sex and opposite sex twins–A pilot study. Clinical Endocrinology, 94, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, K., & Tian, Z. (2022). The effect of motherhood on wages: Are women’s wage penalties due to lack of career aspirations? Applied Economics, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2156469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Mainar, I., Montuenga, V. M., & García-Martín, G. (2018). Occupational prestige and gender-occupational segregation. Work, employment and society, 32, 348–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2019). Evolutionary perspective on sex differences in the expression of neurological diseases. Progress in Neurobiology, 176, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, D. C. (2021). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geher, G., & Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Mating intelligence unleashed: The role of the mind in sex, dating, and love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giammanco, M., Tabacchi, G., Giammanco, S., Di Majo, D., & La Guardia, M. (2005). Testosterone and aggressiveness. Medical Science Monitor, 11, 136–145.Google ScholarPubMed
Gielen, A. C., Holmes, J., & Myers, C. (2016). Prenatal testosterone and the earnings of men and women. Journal of Human Resources, 51, 30–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giofre, D, Geary, D. C., & Halsey, L. G. (2025). The sexy and formidable male body: Men’s height and weight are condition dependent sexually selected traits. Biology Letters, 21, 20240565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gooren, L. (2007). Testosterone and the brain. Journal of Men’s Health & Gender, 4, 344–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouchie, C., & Kimura, D. (1991). The relationship between testosterone levels and cognitive ability patterns. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, 323–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, V. J., & France, J. T. (2001). Dominance and testosterone in women. Biological Psychology, 58, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, D. N., Warrier, V., Allison, C., and Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Testing the empathizing-systemizing theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism in half a million people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 12152–12157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimshaw, G. M., Bryden, M. P., & Finegan, J.-A. K. (1995). Relations between prenatal testosterone and cerebral lateralization in children. Neuropsychology, 9, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., et al. (2009). Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 980–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guigueno, M. F., & Sealy, S. G. (2012). Nest sanitation in passerine birds: Implications for egg rejection in hosts of brood parasites. Journal of Ornithology, 153, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankin, B. L. (2013). Critical reflections on evolutionary psychology and sexual selection theory as explanatory account of emergence of sex differences in psychopathology: Comment on Martel (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1260–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S., Davies, N. M., Howe, L. D., & Hughes, A. (2021). Testosterone and socioeconomic position: Mendelian randomization in 306,248 men and women in UK Biobank. Science Advances, 7(31), 8257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haynes, E., & DeBeliso, M. (2019). The relationship between cross fit performance and grip strength. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, 5, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinsohn, R., & Double, M. C. (2004). Cooperate or speciate: New theory for the distribution of passerine birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 55–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helle, S., Laaksonen, T., Adamsson, A., Paranko, J., & Huitu, O. (2008). Female field voles with high testosterone and glucose levels produce male-biased litters. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriques-Neto, D. M., Peralta, M., & Marques, A. (2023). Puberty: Neurologic and physiologic development and its multifaceted dimensions. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14, 1258656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, J. (2015). Testosterone: Sex, power, and the will to win Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Hier, D. B., & Crowley, W. F. Jr (1982). Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1202–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschberg, A. L., Knutsson, J. E., Helge, T., et al. (2020). Effects of moderately increased testosterone concentration on physical performance in young women: A double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54, 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, B. F. (1977). Two new cases of XYY chromosome complement. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 22, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooven, C. (2021). T: The story of testosterone, the hormone that dominates and divides us. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hooven, C. K., Chabris, C. F., Ellison, P. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 42, 782–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoover, K. C. (2010). Smell with inspiration: The evolutionary significance of olfaction. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horowitz, M., Yaworsky, W., & Kickham, K. (2014). Whither the blank slate? A report on the reception of evolutionary biological ideas among sociological theorists. Sociological Spectrum, 34, 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A., & Kumari, M. (2019). Testosterone, risk, and socioeconomic position in British men: Exploring causal directionality. Social Science & Medicine, 220, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iannuzzi, V., Bacalini, M. G., Franceschi, C., & Giuliani, C. (2023). The role of genetics and epigenetics in sex differences in human survival. Genus, 79(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, L. F. (1996). Sexual selection and the brain. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 82–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2, e1500983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janowsky, J. S., Oviatt, S. K., & Orwoll, E. (1994). Testosterone influences spatial cognition in older men. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jardí, F., Laurent, M. R., Dubois, V., et al. (2018). Androgen and estrogen actions on male physical activity: A story beyond muscle. Journal of Endocrinology, 238, R31–R52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvinen, M., & Kannus, P. (1997). Current concepts review-injury of an extremity as a risk factor for the development of osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 79, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jašarević, E., Geary, D. C., & Rosenfeld, C. S. (2012). Sexually selected traits: A fundamental framework for studies on behavioral epigenetics. ILAR Journal, 53, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jobling, M., & Tyler-Smith, C. (2019). Human evolutionary genetics: Origins, peoples, and disease: New York: Garland Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P., & Thayer, B. A. (2016). The evolution of offensive realism: Survival under anarchy from the Pleistocene to the present. Politics and the Life Sciences, 35, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonason, P. K. (2007). An evolutionary psychology perspective on sex differences in exercise behaviors and motivations. Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. C., & Rossiter, J. R. (2009). Social and religious factors in adolescents’ drug use. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 18, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2005). Is “discrimination” necessary to explain the sex gap in earnings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2019). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41, 80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimi, A. (2014). Effects of the timing of births on women’s earnings: Evidence from a natural experiment. Working Paper, No. 2014:17, Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU), Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9, 156–185.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keevil, B., MacDonald, P., Macdowall, W., et al. (2014). Salivary testosterone measurement by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in adult males and females. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 51, 368–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempel, P., Gohlke, B., Klempau, J., et al. (2005). Second-to-fourth digit length, testosterone, and spatial ability. Intelligence, 33, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, C., & Ross, C. (1999). Sex differences in energy expenditure in non-human primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1437), 2479–2485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, D., & Hampson, E. (1994). Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirillova, G. P., Vanyukov, M. M., Kirisci, L., & Reynolds, M. (2008). Physical maturation, peer environment, and the ontogenesis of substance use disorders. Psychiatry Research, 158, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11, 181–209.Google Scholar
Knickmeyer, R. C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Fetal testosterone and sex differences. Early Human Development, 82, 755–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolakowski, D., & Malina, R. M. (1974). Spatial ability, throwing accuracy and man’s hunting heritage. Nature, 251, 410–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopsida, E., Stergiakouli, E., Lynn, P. M., Wilkinson, L. S., & Davies, W. (2009). The role of the Y chromosome in brain function. Open Neuroendocrinology Journal, 2, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The relative importance of intra-and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, M. L., & Norris, P. (2014). Beyond quotas: Strategies to promote gender equality in elected office. Political Studies, 62, 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, D. J., Wang, X.-T., & Wilke, A. (2007). Towards the development of an evolutionarily valid domain-specific risk-taking scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(3), 147470490700500306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumagai, H., Yoshikawa, T., Zempo-Miyaki, A., et al. (2018). Vigorous physical activity is associated with regular aerobic exercise-induced increased serum testosterone levels in overweight/obese men. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 50, 73–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Kurath, J., & Mata, R. (2018). Individual differences in risk taking and endogenous levels of testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol: A systematic literature search and three independent meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 428–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutschera, U., & Niklas, K. J. (2004). The modern theory of biological evolution: An expanded synthesis. Naturwissenschaften, 91, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63, 767–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemiere, J., Boets, B., & Danckaerts, M. (2010). No association between the 2D: 4D fetal testosterone marker and multidimensional attentional abilities in children with ADHD. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52, e202–e208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lennon, M. C. (1994). Women, work, and well-being: The importance of work conditions. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, D. A., Verheul, I., & Thurik, R. (2019). Entrepreneurship and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A large-scale study involving the clinical condition of ADHD. Small Business Economics, 53, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liben, L. S., Susman, E. J., Finkelstein, J. W., et al. (2002). The effects of sex steroids on spatial performance: a review and an experimental clinical investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 236–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 659–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebenberg, L. (1990). The Art of Tracking the Origin of Science. Cape Town: David Phillip.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. T. (2008). Sex hormones’ regulation of rodent physical activity: A review. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people–things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippa, R. A. (2002). Gender, nature, and nurture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippa, R. A. (2010). Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 619–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luoto, S., & Varella, M. A. C. (2021). Pandemic leadership: Sex differences and their evolutionary–developmental origins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 618–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüpold, S., Manier, M. K., Puniamoorthy, N., et al. (2016). How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation. Nature, 533(7604), 535–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luxen, M. F. (2007). Sex differences, evolutionary psychology, and biosocial theory: Biosocial theory is no alternative. Theory & Psychology, 17, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Määttänen, I., Jokela, M., Hintsa, T., et al. (2013). Testosterone and temperament traits in men: Longitudinal analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 2243–2248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddan, S., Walker, J. T., & Miller, J. M. (2008). Does size really matter? A reexamination of Sheldon’s somatotypes and criminal behavior. Social Science Journal, 45, 330–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, C. (2009). Gender, occupational prestige, and wages: A test of devaluation theory. European Sociological Review, 25, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Speed, L., Croijmans, I., & Arshamian, A. (2017). What makes a better smeller? Perception, 46, 406–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, J. T., & Taylor, R. P. (2001). Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., Newton, D. J., & Flanagan, B. F. (2003). The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinucci, L., Mazzuca, C., & Gangemi, A. (2023). Exposing implicit biases and stereotypes in human and artificial intelligence: state of the art and challenges with a focus on gender. AI & Society, 38, 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Hunting and gathering: The human sexual division of foraging labor. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 170–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martel, M. M. (2013). Sexual selection and sex differences in the prevalence of childhood externalizing and adolescent internalizing disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1221–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martel, M. M., Gobrogge, K. L., Breedlove, S. M., & Nigg, J. T. (2008). Masculinized finger-length ratios of boys, but not girls, are associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Neuroscience, 122, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxfield, S., Shapiro, M., Gupta, V., & Hass, S. (2010). Gender and risk: Women, risk taking and risk aversion. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25, 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, N. (1974). The rationality of scientific discovery part I: The traditional rationality problem. Philosophy of Science, 41(2), 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAndrew, F. T. (2009). The interacting roles of testosterone and challenges to status in human male aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 330–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D., Westhafer, J. G., Pasanen, E. G., Carlson, C. L., & Tucker, D. M. (2005). Physiological evidence of hypermasculinization in boys with the inattentive type of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Clinical Neuroscience Research, 5, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1949). Male and female: A study of the sexes in a changing world. Oxford: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Mealey, L. (2000). Sex differences: Development and evolutionary strategies. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, P. H., Jones, A. C., & Josephs, R. A. (2008). The social endocrinology of dominance: basal testosterone predicts cortisol changes and behavior following victory and defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mhillaj, E., Morgese, M. G., Tucci, P., et al. (2015). Effects of anabolic-androgens on brain reward function. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikac, U., Buško, V., Sommer, W., & Hildebrandt, A. (2016). Analysis of different sources of measurement error in determining second-to-fourth digit ratio, a potential indicator of perinatal sex hormones exposure. Review of Psychology, 23, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. M. (1994). Prenatal sex hormone transfer: A reason to study opposite-sex twins. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2008). A subordinate status position increases the present value of financial resources for low 2D:4D men. American Journal of Human Biology, 20, 110–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda-Mendizabal, A., Castellví, P., Parés-Badell, O., et al. (2019). Gender differences in suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. International Journal of Public Health, 64, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modlinska, K., Adamczyk, D., Maison, D., & Pisula, W. (2020). Gender differences in attitudes to vegans/vegetarians and their food preferences, and their implications for promoting sustainable dietary patterns–a systematic review. Sustainability, 12, 6292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, S. D., & Hampson, E. (1996). A curvilinear relationship between testosterone and spatial cognition in humans: Possible influence of hand preference. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 21, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffit, D. M., & Swanik, C. B. (2011). The association between athleticism, prenatal testosterone, and finger length. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 25, 1085–1088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. B., McIntyre, N. H., & Lanivich, S. E. (2021). ADHD-related neurodiversity and the entrepreneurial mindset. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nag, P., & Yalçın, Ö. (2020). Gender stereotypes in virtual agents. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 41, https://doi.org/10.1145/3383652.3423876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, N., Laing, S., Fink, B., & Manning, J. T. (2003). Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone, and perceived male dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270(1529), 2167–2172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Negri-Cesi, P., Colciago, A., Celotti, F., & Motta, M. (2004). Sexual differentiation of the brain: Role of testosterone and its active metabolites. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 27, 120–127.Google ScholarPubMed
Ngun, T. C., Ghahramani, N., Sánchez, F. J., Bocklandt, S., & Vilain, E. (2011). The genetics of sex differences in brain and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaou, N., Patel, P. C., & Wolfe, M. T. (2018). Testosterone and tendency to engage in self-employment. Management Science, 64, 1825–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, J. V., Yudkevich, M., Orel, E., & Kochergina, E. (2014). The effects of prenatal testosterone on adult wages: Evidence from Russian rims data and measured 2D:4D digit ratios. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, S., & Liu, H. (2023). Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies: challenges and opportunities. AI & Society, 38, 1–13.Google Scholar
Okami, P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 186–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G. A. (1974). Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour, 48, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawłowski, B. (2000). The biological meaning of preferences on the human mate market. Przegląd Antropologiczny ñ Anthropological Review, 63, 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perret, M. (2018). Revisiting the Trivers-Willard theory on birth sex ratio bias: Role of paternal condition in a Malagasy primate. PLoS One, 13(12), e0209640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, R. M., & Higham, J. P. (2020). The role of sexual selection in the evolution of facial displays in male non-human primates and men. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettay, J. E., Helle, S., Jokela, J., & Lummaa, V. (2007). Natural selection on female life-history traits in relation to socio-economic class in pre-industrial human populations. PLoS One, 2(7), e606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaff, D. W., Rubin, R. T., Schneider, J. E., & Head, G. (2018). Principles of hormone/behavior relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (2013). Realism and the aim of science: From the postscript to the logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, S. D. (2013). The origins of altruism in offspring care. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1305–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puts, D. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puts, D. A., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2012). Sexual selection on human faces and voices. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putz, T., & Engelhardt-Woelfler, H. (2014). The effects of the first birth timing on women’s wages: A longitudinal analysis based on the German socio-economic panel. Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research, 26, 302–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinsey, V. L. (2002). Evolutionary theory and criminal behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnu, V. S., Emami, M. R., & Bredy, T. W. (2017). Genetic and epigenetic factors underlying sex differences in the regulation of gene expression in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riachy, R., McKinney, K., & Tuvdendorj, D. R. (2020). Various factors may modulate the effect of exercise on testosterone levels in men. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 5, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rismayanthi, C., Kristiyanto, A., & Doewes, M. (2022). Psychological-based physical exercise education model for improving elderly physical fitness. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. A., & Martel, M. M. (2013). Prenatal testosterone and preschool disruptive behavior disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 962–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roldan, E. R. S., & Gomendio, M. (1999). The Y chromosome as a battle ground for sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronay, R., & Von Hippel, W. (2010). Power, testosterone, and risk‐taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2013). Hormonal predictors of sexual motivation in natural menstrual cycles. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 636–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roof, R. L., & Havens, M. D. (1992). Testosterone improves maze performance and induces development of a male hippocampus in females. Brain Research, 572, 310–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, R., Maughan, B., Worthman, C. M., Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (2004). Testosterone, antisocial behavior, and social dominance in boys: Pubertal development and biosocial interaction. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, B. C., & Vandenbergh, J. G. (2002). Intrauterine position effects. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, M. J. (2021). Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, e2008194118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (2017). Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 783–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, S. K., & Ellis, L. (1992). Theoretical and political perspectives of American sociologists in the 1990s. American Sociologist, 23, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P., Bergman, K., Fisk, N., O’Connor, T., & Glover, V. (2007). Amniotic fluid testosterone: Relationship with cortisol and gestational age. Clinical Endocrinology, 67, 743–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarkar, P., Bergman, K., O’Connor, T. G., & Glover, V. (2008). Maternal antenatal anxiety and amniotic fluid cortisol and testosterone: possible implications for foetal programming. Journal of neuroendocrinology, 20(4), 489–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savic, I., Frisen, L., Manzouri, A., Nordenstrom, A., & Lindén Hirschberg, A. (2017). Role of testosterone and Y chromosome genes for the masculinization of the human brain. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 1801–1814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneck, S. (2020). Self-employment as a source of income inequality. Eurasian Business Review, 10, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuett, W., Tregenza, T., & Dall, S. R. X. (2010). Sexual selection and animal personality. Biological Reviews, 85, 217–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwindt‐Bayer, L. A. (2009). Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2011). Variation in CAG repeat length of the androgen receptor gene predicts variables associated with intrasexual competitiveness in human males. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinervo, B., Miles, D. B., Frankino, W. A., Klukowski, M., & DeNardo, D. F. (2000). Testosterone, endurance, and Darwinian fitness: Natural and sexual selection on the physiological bases of alternative male behaviors in side-blotched lizards. Hormones and Behavior, 38, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipilä, S., Narici, M., Kjaer, M., et al. (2013). Sex hormones and skeletal muscle weakness. Biogerontology, 14, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skutch, A. F. (1976). Parent birds and their young. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. R., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent risk-taking. Hormones and Behavior, 64, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. A. (2004). Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? Human Nature, 15, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human nature, 6(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohail, S. S., Madsen, D. Ø., Himeur, Y., & Ashraf, M. (2023). Using ChatGPT to navigate ambivalent and contradictory research findings on artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, PMC10413582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soma, K. (2006). Testosterone and aggression: Berthold, birds and beyond. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 18, 543–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, S. (2009). The subject of multiculturalism: Culture, religion, language, ethnicity, nationality, and race? In d. Bruin, B. & Zurn, C. F. (Eds.), New waves in political philosophy (pp. 177–197). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorokowski, P., Karwowski, M., Misiak, M., et al. (2019). Sex differences in human olfaction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, J., & Wickham-Jones, M. (2001). Women in parliament: A comparative analysis. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (1993). The evolutionary links between fixed and variable traits. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 38, 215–232.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, J., Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Social role effects on gender stereotyping in Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenstrom, E., Saad, G., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Mendenhall, Z. (2011). Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D: 4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 412–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J. C., Everson, P. M., Williams, D. C., et al. (2007). Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and digit ratios in a college sample. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockemer, D. (2011). Women’s parliamentary representation in Africa: The impact of democracy and corruption on the number of female deputies in national parliaments. Political Studies, 59, 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns in students across developed countries. Intelligence, 81, 101453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, T. W., Woodhouse, L., Magliano, L., et al. (2008). Changes in muscle mass, muscle strength, and power but not physical function are related to testosterone dose in healthy older men. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1991–1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swerdloff, R. S., Wang, C., Hines, M., & Gorski, R. (1992). Effect of androgens on the brain and other organs during development and aging. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talia, C., Raja, E.-A., Bhattacharya, S., & Fowler, P. A. (2020). Testing the twin testosterone transfer hypothesis – intergenerational analysis of 317 dizygotic twins born in Aberdeen, Scotland. Human Reproduction, 35, 1702–1711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tahira, A. C., Barbosa, A. R., Feltrin, A. S. A., et al. (2019). Putative contributions of the sex chromosome proteins SOX3 and SRY to neurodevelopmental disorders. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 180, 390–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tapp, A. L., Maybery, M. T., & Whitehouse, A. J. (2011). Evaluating the twin testosterone transfer hypothesis: A review of the empirical evidence. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 713–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toivainen, T., Pannini, G., Papageorgiou, K. A., et al. (2018). Prenatal testosterone does not explain sex differences in spatial ability. Scientific Reports, 8, 13653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosi, L. L., Boyan, B. D., & Boskey, A. L. (2005). Does sex matter in musculoskeletal health? The influence of sex and gender on musculoskeletal health. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87, 1631–1647.Google ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, R. E. (1998). Testosterone, physical aggression, dominance, and physical development in early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 753–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1976). Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution, 30, 253–269.Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, C., McClure, R., & Pirozzo, S. (2004). Injury and risk-taking behavior—a systematic review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaamonde, D., Da Silva-Grigoletto, M. E., García-Manso, J. M., Barrera, N., & Vaamonde-Lemos, R. (2012). Physically active men show better semen parameters and hormone values than sedentary men. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112, 3267–3273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valla, J. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2011). Can sex differences in science be tied to the long reach of prenatal hormones? Brain organization theory, digit ratio (2D:4D), and sex differences in preferences and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Goozen, S. H., Wiegant, V. M., Endert, E., Helmond, F. A., & Van de Poll, N. E. (1997). Psychoendocrinological assessment of the menstrual cycle: the relationship between hormones, sexuality, and mood. Archives of sexual behavior, 26, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vercken, E., Wellenreuther, M., Svensson, E. I., & Mauroy, B. (2012). Don’t fall off the adaptation cliff: When asymmetrical fitness selects for suboptimal traits. PLoS One, 7(4), e34889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeersch, H., T’Sjoen, G., Kaufman, J., & Vincke, J. (2008). 2D:4D, sex steroid hormones and human psychological sex differences. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 340–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villarreal, A. (2002). Political competition and violence in Mexico: Hierarchical social control in local patronage structures. American Sociological Review, 67, 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volman, I., Toni, I., Verhagen, L., & Roelofs, K. (2011). Endogenous testosterone modulates prefrontal–amygdala connectivity during social emotional behavior. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 2282–2290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vongas, J. G., & Al Hajj, R. (2015). Competing sexes, power, and testosterone: How winning and losing affect people’s empathic responses and what this means for organisations. Applied Psychology, 64, 308–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Votinov, M., Knyazeva, I., Habel, U., Konrad, K., & Puiu, A. A. (2022). A Bayesian modeling approach to examine the role of testosterone administration on the endowment effect and risk-taking. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 858168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, G., Lukyanenko, R., & Paré, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. Journal of Information Technology, 37, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.-J., Chou, M.-C., Chou, W.-J., et al. (2017). Potential role of pre-and postnatal testosterone levels in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is there a sex difference? Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 1331–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waynforth, D. (2001). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisfeld, G. E., & Dillon, L. M. (2012). Applying the dominance hierarchy model to pride and shame, and related behaviors. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welker, K. M., Gruber, J., & Mehta, P. H. (2015). A positive affective neuroendocrinology approach to reward and behavioral dysregulation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. E., Thornhill, S., & Hampson, E. (2007). A biosocial model of entrepreneurship: The combined effects of nurture and nature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. I., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. L., Miller, C. M., & Crouse, K. N. (2017). Humans as a model species for sexual selection research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1866), 20171320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Pound, N. (2009). Sex differences and intrasexual variation in competitive confrontation and risk taking: An evolutionary psychological perspective. In Pfaff, D. W., Arnold, A. P., Etgen, A. M., Fahrbach, S. E., & Rubin, R. T. (Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (pp. 2825–2852). San Diego: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witteveen, D., & Westerman, J. (2023). Structural change shapes career mobility opportunities: An analysis of cohorts, gender, and parental class. Work, Employment and Society, 37, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, B. B., & Candolin, U. (2005). How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biological Reviews, 80, 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wynn, T. G., Tierson, F. D., & Palmer, C. T. (1996). Evolution of sex differences in spatial cognition. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101(S23), 11–42.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaidi, Z. F. (2010). Gender differences in human brain: A review. Open Anatomy Journal, 2, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, L.-N., Zong, Q.-Q., Yang, Y., et al. (2020). Gender difference in the prevalence of insomnia: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 577429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, N., & Chang, L. (2019). Evolved but not fixed: A life history account of gender roles and gender inequality. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1709–1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhuo, S., Zhang, W., Fan, J., et al. (2022). Single-dose testosterone administration modulates instant empathic responses to others’ pain: An EEG study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 141, 105768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zitzmann, M. (2006). Testosterone and the brain. Aging Male, 9, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
The PDF of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.