Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-28T14:14:46.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2025

Eleanor Helms
Eleanor Helms
Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Kierkegaard and the Structure of Imagination
Rethinking Thought Experiments with Kant and Ørsted
 , pp. 257 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abaci, Uygar. “Kant’s Enigmatic Transition: Practical Cognition of the Supersensible.” In The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds: New Essays on Kant’s Metaphysics and Epistemology. Ed. Schafer, Karl and Stang, Nicholas F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, 360–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abiko, Saiya. “Einstein’s Kyoto Address: ‘How I Created the Theory of Relativity.’” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31:1 (2000): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Joshua and Weinberg, Jonathan M.. “Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 2:1 (2007): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Kant and the Two Dogmas of Rationalism.” In A Companion to Rationalism. Ed. Nelson, Alan. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andow, James. “Intuitions about Cases as Evidence (For How We Should Think).” Inquiry 66:6 (2023): 1036–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcangeli, Margherita. “Narratives and Thought Experiments: Restoring the Role of Imagination.” In Epistemic Uses of Imagination. Eds. Badura, Christopher, Kind, Amy. New York: Routledge, 2021, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Antony. Art and Selfhood. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Antony. “Kierkegaard on the Transformative Power of Art.” History of European Ideas 47:3 (2021): 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Theodore. “Why the Empirical Study of Non-Philosophical Expertise Does Not Undermine the Status of Philosophical Expertise.” Erkenntnis 86 (2021): 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaguer, Mark. “The Metaphysical Irrelevance of the Compatibilism Debate (and, More Generally, of Conceptual Analysis).” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 47:1 (2009):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, E.C. “The Philosophical Roots of Ernst Mach’s Economy of Thought.” Synthese 139:1 (2004): 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Julian. “Kann man lernen, mit Gedanken zu experimentieren? Ernst Machs Vorstellung des Gedankenexperiments im Kontext der zeitgenössischen Pädagogik [Can One Learn to Experiment with Thoughts? Ernst Mach’s Presentation of Thought Experiments in the Context of Contemporary Pedagogy.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte [Reports on the History of Science] 38:1 (2015): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealer, George. “Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance.” In Conceivability and Possibility. Eds. Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 71–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Simon. “Technological Fictions and Personal Identity: On Ricoeur, Schechtman and Analytic Thought Experiments.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 47:2 (2016): 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Simon and Oyowe, Oritsegbubemi Anthony. “Thought Experiments and Personal Identity in Africa.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 7:4 (2021): 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengson, John. “The Unity of Understanding.” In Making Sense of the World: New Essays on the Philosophy of Understanding. Ed. Grimm, Stephen S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bengson, John. “Grasping the Third Realm.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, vol. 5. Eds. Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 1–39.Google Scholar
Bengson, John. “The Intellectual Given.” Mind 124:495 (2015): 707–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghofer, Philipp. “Successful Intuition vs. Intellectual Hallucination: How We Non-Accidentally Grasp the Third Realm.” Erkenntnis (online March 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghofer, Philipp. “Towards a Phenomenological Conception of Experiential Justification.” Synthese 197 (2020): 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, Daniel. The Ethics of Authorship: Communication, Seduction, and Death in Hegel and Kierkegaard. New York: Fordham University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Max. Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned. The Border between Seeing and Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøggild, Jacob. “The Fine Art of Writing Posthumous Papers: On the Dubious Role of the Romantic Fragment in the First Part of Either/Or.” Kierkegaardiana 19 (1998): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. Collected Fictions. Trans. Hurley, Andrew. London: Penguin Classics, 1998.Google Scholar
Boven, Martijn, “A Theater of Ideas: Performance and Performativity in Kierkegaard’s Repetition.” In Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts. Ed. Ziolkowski, Eric. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2018, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boven, Martijn. “Psychological Experiment.” In Kierkegaard’s Concepts: Objectivity to Sacrifice, vol. 15, Tome V. Eds. Stewart, Jon, Emmanuel, Steven M., and McDonald, William. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2015, 159–165.Google Scholar
Brendel, Elke. “Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments.” Dialectica 58:1 (2004): 89–108.10.1111/j.1746-8361.2004.tb00293.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Kimberly. “Kant’s Theory of the Intuitive Intellect.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 39: 2 (2022): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert. “Explaining, Seeing, and Understanding in Thought Experiments.” In Perspectives on Science 22:3 (2014): 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert. “What Do We See in a Thought Experiment?” In Thought Experiments in Science, Philosophy, and the Arts. Eds. Frappier, Melanie, Meynell, Letitia, Brown, James Robert. New York: Routledge, 2012, 53–68.Google Scholar
Brown, James Robert. The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. New York: Routledge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert. “Why Thought Experiments Do Transcend Empiricism.” In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Ed. Hitchcock, Christopher. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, 23–43.Google Scholar
Brown, James Robert. “Peeking into Plato’s Heaven.” Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 1126–1138.10.1086/425940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert. “Platonic Explanation: Or, What Abstract Entities Can Do For You.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3:1 (1988): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Anthony G. “From Being to Acting: Kant and Fichte on Intellectual Intuition.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31:4 (2022): 762–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubbio, Paolo Diego. Sacrifice in the Post-Kantian Tradition. Albany: SUNY Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Buben, Adam. “Neither Irrationalist nor Apologist: Revisiting Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard.” Philosophy Compass 8:3 (2013): 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buben, Adam. “Heidegger’s Reception of Kierkegaard: The Existential Philosophy of Death.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21:5 (2013): 967–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler. “Frege on Knowing the Third Realm.” Mind 101:404 (1992): 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Andrew. “Forstand in the Swenson-Lowrie Correspondence and the ‘Metaphysical Caprices.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus. Ed. Perkins, Robert L.. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1994, 109–128.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Hempel: Thought Experiments between Methodological Monism and the Discovery/Justification Dichotomy.” Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 61:1 (2024): 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “A Neglected Chapter in the History of Philosophy of Mathematical Thought Experiments: Insights from Jean Piaget’s Reception of Edmond Goblot.” HOPOS 11 (2021): 282–304.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Thought Experiments in Philosophy: A Neo-Kantian and Experimentalist Point of View.” Topoi 38:4 (2019): 771–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Kantian Accounts of Thought Experiments.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert. New York: Routledge, 2018, 327–341.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Pierre Duhem and Ernst Mach on Thought Experiments.” HOPOS 8 (2018): 1–27.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Causality, Teleology, and Thought Experiments in Biology.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46:2 (2015): 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “On Thought Experiments and the Kantian a priori in the Natural Sciences: A Reply to Yiftach J.H. Fehige.” Epistemologia 36 (2013): 277–293.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Thought Experiments from a Kantian Point of View.” In Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts. Eds. Frappier, Melanie, Meynell, Letitia, and Brown, James R.. London: Routledge, 2012, 90–106.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Kant und das Gedankenexperiment. Über eine kantische Theorie der Gedankenexperimente in den Naturwissenschaften und in der Philosophie.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59:1 (2011): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. Thought Experiment in the Natural Sciences: An Operational and Reflexive-Transcendental Conception. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2008.Google Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco. “Zum Verhältnis zwischen Experiment und Gedankenexperiment in den Naturwissenschaften [On the Relation Between Experiment and Thought Experiment in the Natural Sciences].” Journal for General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38:2 (2007): 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzoni, Marco and Savojardo, Valentina. “Thought Experiments between Theology, Empirical Science, and Fictional Narrative.” Religions 10:393 (2019):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman. Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman and Plunkett, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Eds. Burgess, Alexis, Cappelen, Herman, and Plunkett, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Ulrika. Kierkegaard and Philosophical Eros: Between Ironic Reflection and Aesthetic Meaning. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Karen. “The Offense of Reason and the Passion of Faith: Kierkegaard and Anti Rationalism.” Faith and Philosophy 13:2 (1996): 236–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël, “The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60:1 (2002): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervi, Andrea. “Rilke, Die Aufzeichnungen des Malte Laurids Brigge.” In The German Novel in the 20th Century. Ed. Midgley, David. Edinburgh: St. Martin’s Press, 1993, 45–58.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. “Intuitions in Philosophy: A Minimal Defense.” Philosophical Studies 171:3 (2014): 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. “Modal Motives for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, Coherence.” Kant-Studien 105 (2014): 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. “Kant’s Concepts of Justification.” Noŭs 41:1 (2007): 33–63.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. “Belief in Kant.” The Philosophical Review 116: 3 (2007): 323–360.10.1215/00318108-2007-001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimisso, Cristina. “Intuition and Discursive Knowledge: Bachelard’s Criticism of Bergson.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31:4 (2023): 825–843.10.1080/09608788.2022.2028600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Dan Ch. Hans Christian Ørsted: Reading Nature’s Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudnoff, Elijah. “How to Use Thought Experiments.” In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Eds. Roeber, Blake, Sosa, Ernest, Steup, Matthias and Turri, John. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2024 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Chudnoff, Elijah. “Two Kinds of Cognitive Expertise.” Noûs 55:2 (2021): 270–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudnoff, Elijah. Forming Impressions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Chudnoff, Elijah. Intuition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. On Duties. Trans. Miller, Walter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Clark, David L. “Kant’s Aliens: The Anthropology and Its Others.” CR: The New Centennial Review 1:2 (2001): 201–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohnitz, Daniel. “Thought Experiments and the (Ir-)Relevance of Intuitions in Philosophy.” In Philosophy in the Age of Science? Inquiries into Philosophical Progress, Method, and Societal Relevance. Eds. Kalf, Wouter Floria, Klenk, Michael, Hopster, Jeroen, and Hermann, Julia. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2020, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohnitz, Daniel. “Ørsteds ‘Gedankenexperiment’: eine Kantianische Fundierung der Infinitesimalrechnung? Ein beitrag zur Begriffsgeschichte von ‘Gedankenexperiment’ und zur Mathematikgeschichte des frühen 19. Jahrhunderts” [Ørsted’s ‘Gedankenexperiment’: A Kantian Foundation for Calculus? A Contribution to the History of the Concept of ‘Gedankenexperiment’ and the History of Mathematics in the Early 19th Century]. Kant-Studien 4:99 (2008): 407–433.Google Scholar
Cohnitz, Daniel. Gedankenexperimente in der Philosophie [Thought Experiments in Philosophy]. Paderborn: Mentis-Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar
Cohnitz, Daniel. “Modal Skepticism: Philosophical Thought Experiments and Modal Epistemology.” In The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism: Re-evaluation and Future Perspectives. Ed. Stadler, F., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003, 281–296.10.1007/0-306-48214-2_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohnitz, Daniel and Haggqvist, Sören. “Thought Experiments in Current Metaphilosophical Debates.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Ed. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert. New York: Routledge, 2018, 406–424.Google Scholar
Compaijen, Rob. “Existentialists or Mystics: Kierkegaard and Murdoch on Imagination and Fantasy in Ethical Life.” History of European Ideas 47:3 (2021): 443–455.10.1080/01916599.2020.1799555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, James. “Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and Nonsense.” In Pursuits of Reason: Essays in Honor of Stanley Cavell. Ed. Cohen, Ted, Guyer, Paul, and Putnam, Hilary. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press, 1993, 195–224.Google Scholar
Cooper, Rachel. “Thought Experiments.” Metaphilosophy 36:3 (2005): 328–347.10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00372.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalferth, Ingolf. “The Middle Term: Kierkegaard and the Contemporary Debate about Explanatory Theism.” In Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 20 (2015): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “The Empire of Observation, 1600–1800.” In Histories of Scientific Observation. Ed. Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011, 81–113.Google Scholar
Davenport, Edward A. “Literature as Thought Experiment (On Aiding and Abetting the Muse).” Philosophy and the Social Sciences 13:3 (1983): 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, John J. Narrative Identity, Autonomy, and Mortality: From Frankfurt and MacIntyre to Kierkegaard. New York: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Knowing One’s Own Mind.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (1987): 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David, “Learning Through Fictional Narratives in Art and Science.” In Beyond Mimesis and Convention. Eds. Frigg, R. and Hunter, M.C., Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, 51–69.10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David. “Thought Experiments and Fictional Narratives.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7:19 (2007): 29–45.Google Scholar
De Brigard, Felipe. “If You Like It, Does It Matter If It’s Real.” Philosophical Psychology 23:1 (2010): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mey, Tim. “Remodeling the Past.” Foundations of Science 10 (2005): 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. “Where Am I?” In The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul. Bantam Books, 1981, 217–231.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: W.W. Norton, 2013.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. “The Milk of Human Intentionality.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980): 428–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Denver: Bradford Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, 4th ed. Trans. Cress, Donald A.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998.Google Scholar
Director, Samuel. “Intuitions, Biases, and Extra-wide Reflective Equilibrium.” Metaphilosophy 51:5 (2020): 674–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domski, Mary. “Kant and Newton on the A Priori Necessity of Geometry.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (2013): 238–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, John J., “Pure Logical Grammar: Anticipatory Categoriality and Articulated Categoriality.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11:2 (2003): 125–139.10.1080/0967255032000074145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, David. “Literature and Thought Experiments.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74: 2 (2016): 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egler, Miguel and Ross, Lewis D.. “Philosophical Expertise under the Microscope.” Synthese 197 (2020): 1077–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. True Enough. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. “The Laboratory of the Mind.” In A Sense of the World: Essays on Fiction, Narrative, and Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 2007, 43–54.Google Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. “Understanding and the Facts.” Philosophical Studies 132:1 (2007): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. “Fiction as Thought Experiment.” Perspectives on Science 22 (2014): 221–241.10.1162/POSC_a_00128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmanuel, Stephen M. “Kierkegaard’s Pragmatist Faith.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51:2 (1991): 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emundts, Dina. “How Does Kant Conceive of Self-Consciousness?” In The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds, eds. Schafer, Karl and Stang, Nicholas F.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2022, 158–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Niels Nymann, Kierkegaard’s Category of Repetition: A Reconstruction, Kierkegaard Studies Monograph Series. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.10.1515/9783110825824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Jonathan. “A Kantian Account of Mathematical Modelling and the Rationality of Scientific Theory Change: The Role of the Equivalence Principle in the Development of General Relativity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 71 (2018): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehige, Yiftach. Thought Experiments, Science, and Theology. Leiden: Brill, 2023.Google Scholar
Fehige, Yiftach. “The Annus Mirabilis of 1986: Thought Experiments and Scientific Pluralism.” HOPOS 11 (2021): 222–240.Google Scholar
Fehige, Yiftach, “The Book of Job as a Thought Experiment: On Science, Religion, and Literature.” Religions 10:77 (2019): 1–12.10.3390/rel10020077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehige, Yiftach, “Theology and Thought Experiments.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James R.. New York: Routledge, 2018, 183–194.Google Scholar
Fehige, Yiftach. “The Relativized a Priori and the Laboratory of the Mind: Towards a Neo-Kantian Account of Thought Experiments in Science.” Epistemologia 36 (2013): 55–73.10.3280/EPIS2013-001004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehige, Yiftach, “‘Experiments of Pure Reason’: Kantianism and Thought Experiments in Science.” Epistemologia 35:1 (2012): 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehige, Yiftach and Stuart, Michael T.. “On the Origins of the Philosophy of Thought Experiments: The Forerun.” Perspectives on Science 22:2 (2014): 179–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo. “Between Cassirer and Kuhn: Some Remarks on Friedman’s Relativized A Priori.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43 (2012): 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flew, Antony. The Logic of Mortality. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.” Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Muraton, Mélissa. “A World Without Imagination? Consequences of Aphantasia for an Existential Account of Self.” History of European Ideas 47:3 (2021): 414–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” The Journal of Philosophy 66:23 (1969): 829–839.10.2307/2023833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, vols. 1 and 2. Trans. Ebert, Philip A. and Rossberg, Marcus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Freitag, Wolfgang and Kraus, Katharina. “An Expressivist Interpretation of Kant’s ‘I Think.’” Noûs 56 (2022): 110–132.10.1111/nous.12350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion: Purity or Despair. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022.10.1017/9781009076005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. “Søren Kierkegaard’s Critique of Eudaimonism and Autonomy.” In Perfektionismus der Autonomie. Eds. Moggach, Douglas, Mooren, Nadine, and Quante, Michael. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2020, 291–308.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. “Kierkegaard’s Use of German Philosophy: Leibniz to Fichte.” In A Companion to Kierkegaard. Ed. Stewart, Jon, 36–49. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good: Virtue, Happiness, and the Kingdom of God. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. “The Moral Argument for the Existence of God and Immortality: Kierkegaard and Kant.” Journal of Religious Ethics 41:1 (2013): 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. “Original Sin and Radical Evil: Kierkegaard and Kant.” Kantian Review 17 (2012): 197–225.10.1017/S1369415412000039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. “Kierkegaard’s Double Movement of Faith and Kant’s Moral Faith.” Religious Studies 48:2 (2012): 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe. “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kierkegaard and Kant.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 69:3 (2011): 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139014083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition.” Synthese 186:1 (2012): 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Kant—Naturphilosophie—Electromagnetism.” In Hans Christian Ørsted and the Romantic Legacy in Science. Eds. Brain, Robert Michael, Cohen, Robert S., Knudsen, Ole. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science.” Philosophy of Science 69:2 (2002): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Kant’s Theory of Geometry.” The Philosophical Review 94:4 (1985): 455–506.10.2307/2185244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Regulative and Constitutive.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (supplement) (1991): 73–102.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1992.tb00658.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. Two New Sciences. Trans. Drake, Stillman. Toronto: Wall & Thompson, 1989.Google Scholar
Garff, Joakim. “Either/Or Read as Bildungsroman.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 27 (2022): 3–33.10.1515/kierke-2022-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Alexander. “Judgments about Thought Experiments.” Mind, 127:505 (2018): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Kant on Aesthetic Ideas, Rational Ideas and the Subject-Matter of Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (2021): 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John, eds. Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. “Thought Experiments Rethought—and Reperceived.” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of the PSA, Symposium Papers) 71:5 (2004): 1152–1163.10.1086/425239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. “Exceptional Persons: On the Limits of Imaginary Cases.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 5:5–6 (1998): 592–610.Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23:6 (1963): 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Goblot, Edmond. “Review of Erkenntnis und Irrtum, by E. Mach.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger 62 (1906): 530–533.Google Scholar
Goffi, Jean-Yves and Roux, Sophie. “On the Very Idea of a Thought Experiment.” In Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 73:20 (1976): 771–791.10.2307/2025679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, Meїr. Livs erindringer og resultater af M. Goldschmidt [Life Memories and Outcomes by M. Goldschmidt]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1877. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Gouwens, David J. “Understanding, Imagination, and Irony in Kierkegaard’s Repetition.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Fear and Trembling and Repetition. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1993, 283–308.Google Scholar
Gram, Moltke S. “Intellectual Intuition: The Continuity Thesis.” Journal of the History of Ideas 42 (1981): 287–304.10.2307/2709321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Ronald M. Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. Kant and Kierkegaard on Time and Eternity. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Niels Henrik. “The Role of Thought Experiments in Science and Religion.” In Science and Religion Dialogue: Past and Future. Ed. Welker, Michael, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2014), 129–140.Google Scholar
Gregory, Frederick. “Hans Christian Ørsted’s Spiritual Interpretation of Natural Science”. In Hans Christian Ørsted And The Romantic Legacy In Science: Ideas, Disciplines, Practices. Eds. Brain, Robert M., Cohen, Robert S., and Knudsen, Ole, 399–416. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Stephen (ed.). Varieties of Understanding: New Perspectives from Philosophy, Psychology, and Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundmann, Thomas. “Platonism and the A Priori in Thought Experiments.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach and Brown, James Robert. New York: Routledge, 2018, 293–308.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. “Do Thought Experiments Have a Life of Their Own? Comments on James Brown, Nancy Nersessian and David Gooding.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (1992), vol. 2, 302–308.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair. The Special Messenger: Rediscovering Kierkegaard. Edinburgh, UK: Humming Earth, 2022.Google Scholar
Hanson, Jeffrey. “After Actuality: Ideality and the Promise of a Purified Religious Vision in Frater Taciturnus.” History of European Ideas 47: 3 (2021): 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom and Wang, Han-Ting. “Setting Up a Real ‘Chinese Room’: An Empirical Replication of a Famous Thought Experiment.” Journal of Experimental Theory and Artificial Intelligence 11 (1999): 153–154.10.1080/095281399146517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. What is Called Thinking? Trans. Gray, J. Glenn. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.Google Scholar
Heis, Jeremy. “Ernst Cassirer’s Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Geometry.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19:4 (2011): 759–94.10.1080/09608788.2011.583421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heis, Jeremy. “Review of Michael Friedman, Kant’s Construction of Nature.” Philosophical Review 123:3 (2014): 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Eleanor. “Kierkegaard’s Metaphysics of the Self.” In The Cambridge Companion to The Sickness unto Death. Eds. Hanson, Jeffrey and Krishek, Sharon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 79–94.Google Scholar
Helms, Eleanor. “Ørsted, Mach, and the History of ‘Thought Experiment.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 30:5 (2022): 837–858.10.1080/09608788.2022.2033693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Eleanor. “Kierkegaard on Andersen and the Art of Storytelling.” In Authorship and Authority in Kierkegaard’s Writings. Ed. Westfall, J.. New York: Bloomsbury, 2019, 173–191.Google Scholar
Helms, Eleanor. “Kierkegaard on Variation and Thought Experiment.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 23 (2018): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Eleanor. “Hope and Chaos of Imagination in Kant and Kierkegaard.” History of European Ideas 47:3 (2021): 456–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Eleanor. “On Climacus’s ‘Against Reason’ Thesis: A Challenge to Westphal.” Faith and Philosophy 34:4 (2017): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helton, Grace. “Thought Experiments as Tools of Theory Clarification.” In Seemings. Ed. McCain, Kevin, Stapleford, Scott, and Steup, Matthias. New York: Routledge, 2024, 252–270.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Aage. Kierkegaards Romaner. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1954.Google Scholar
Hershenov, David B. “Abortions and Distortions: An Analysis of Morally Irrelevant Factors in Thomson’s Violinist Thought Experiment.” Social Theory and Practice 27:1 (2001): 129–148. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiebert, Erwin. “Mach’s Conception of Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences.” In The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy. Ed. Elkana, Y.. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1974, 339–348.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Raoul. Kierkegaard: La Certitude Religieuse. Paris: Librairie Fischbacher, 1907.Google Scholar
Holm, Isak Winkel. Tanken I Billedet: Søren Kierkegaards Poetik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1998.Google Scholar
Hong, Howard V., “Tanke-Experiment in Kierkegaard.” In Kierkegaard: Resources and Results. Ed. McKinnon, Alastair. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1982, 38–51.Google Scholar
Horgan, Terry and Timmons, Mark. “Exploring Intuitions on Moral Twin Earth: A Reply to Sonderholm.” Theoria 81:4 (2015): 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Joachim and Wiegmann, Alex. “Intuitive Expertise and Intuitions about Knowledge.” Philosophical Studies 173 (2016): 2701–2726.10.1007/s11098-016-0627-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Experience and Judgment. Trans. Churchill, James Spencer and Ameriks, Karl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Philosophy, vol. 1. Trans. Kersten, F.. Dordrecht: Springer, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Meditations. Trans. Cairns, Dorian. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.10.1007/978-94-017-4952-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan and Jarvis, Benjamin. “Thought-Experiment Intuitions and Truth in Fiction.” Philosophical Studies 142 (2009): 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan. “Intuition in Contemporary Philosophy.” In Rational Intuition: Philosophical Roots, Scientific Investigations. Ed. Osbeck, Lisa M. and Held, Barbara S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, Herbert E. and Stilwell, G.R.. “An Experimental Study of the Rate of a Moving Atomic Clock.” Journal of the Optical Society of America 28:7 (1938): 215–226.10.1364/JOSA.28.000215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” The Philosophical Quarterly 32:127 (1982), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. “What Mary Didn’t Know.” The Journal of Philosophy 83:5 (1986): 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. Surviving Death. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.10.1515/9781400834600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. “Human Beings.” Journal of Philosophy 84 (1987): 60–83.10.2307/2026626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaftanski, Wojciech. “Imagination, Mental Representation, and Moral Agency: Moral Pointers in Kierkegaard and Ricoeur.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23 (2024): 179–198.10.1007/s11097-022-09813-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaftanski, Wojciech. Kierkegaard, Mimesis, and Modernity: A Study of Imitation, Existence, and Affect. New York: Routledge, 2022.Google Scholar
Kaftanski, Wojciech and Rossatti, Gabriel Guedes. “Frater Taciturnus: the Two Lives of the Silent Brother.” In Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception, and Resources (Kierkegaard’s Pseudonyms, vol. 17). New York: Routledge, 2015, 67–88.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason.” In Krueger, J. and Lipscomb, B. (eds.), Kant’s Moral Metaphysics. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010, 211–230.10.1515/9783110220049.4.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalin, Martin G. “Kant’s Transcendental Arguments as Gedankexperimente.” Kant-Studien 63:1–4 (1972): 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511804649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.10.1017/CBO9780511804656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Logic. Ed. and trans. Young, J. Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Opus Postumum. Ed. and trans. Förster, Eckart and Rosen, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.10.1017/CBO9780511625169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. Trans. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.10.1017/CBO9780511814433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Ed. and trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Ed. and trans. Allison, Henry, Heath, Peter, Hatfield, Gary, and Friedman, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory. “The Toxin Puzzle.” Analysis 43:1 (1983): 33–36.10.1093/analys/43.1.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Ryan S. and Frank, Della Torre. “Kierkegaard’s Strong Anti-Rationalism: Offense as a Propaedeutic to Faith.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 27 (2022): 193–214.10.1515/kierke-2022-0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Ryan S. and Christopher, Iacovetti Reason and Conversion in Kierkegaard and the German Idealists. New York: Routledge, 2020.10.4324/9781351182287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Ryan S. “The Role of Imagination in Kierkegaard’s Account of Ethical Transformation.” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 100: 2 (2018): 202–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Crumbs. Trans. Hannay, Alastair. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kirmmse, Bruce H. and Laursen, Virginia R. (eds.). Encounters with Kierkegaard: A Life as Seen by His Contemporaries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Klempe, Sven Hroar. Kierkegaard and the Rise of Modern Psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2014.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua and Nichols, Shaun. Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.10.1093/oso/9780195323252.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobe, Joshua, Lombrozo, Tania, and Nichols, Shaun (eds.). Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, vols. 1–4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015–2022.Google Scholar
Kolb, Daniel C. “Thought and Intuition in Kant’s Critical System.” Journal of Philosophy 24:2 (1986): 223–241.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle. Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimsky, Sheldon. “The Use and Misuse of Critical Gedankenexperimente.” Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie/Journal for General Philosophy of Science 4:2 (1973): 323–334.10.1007/BF01800847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. “A Function for Thought Experiments.” In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011, 240–265.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Eds. Conant, James and Haugeland, John. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. “Afterwords.” World Changes. Ed. Horwich, Paul. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kühne, Ulrich. Die Methode des Gedankenexperiments [The Method of Thought Experiment]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2005.Google Scholar
Kujundzic, Nebojsa. “Thought Experiments, Puzzles, and Paradoxes.” Philosophy Study 3:8 (2013): 750–757.Google Scholar
Kung, Peter. “Thought Experiments in Ethics.” In Knowledge Through Imagination. Eds. Kind, Amy and Kung, Peter. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (2016), 227–246.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716808.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Caze, Marguerite. The Analytic Imaginary. Ithaca, NY: Cornell, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, Peter. “Objects of Interpretation.” Metaphilosophy 31:1–2 (2000): 96–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith. Art, Self, and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304985.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith. Exemplars of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.10.1093/oso/9780190884277.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Janet. “Can Modal Intuitions be Evidence for Essentialist Claims?” Inquiry 50:3 (2007): 253–269.10.1080/00201740701356154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Michael E. “A Definition of A Priori Knowledge.” The Journal of Critical Analysis 6:1 (1975): 1–8.10.5840/jcritanal1975619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. “Truth in Fiction: Postscript.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, 276–280.Google Scholar
Liao, Matthew S., Wiegmann, Alex, Alexander, Joshua, and Vong, Gerard. “Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case.” Philosophical Psychology 25:5 (2012): 661–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, Georg Ch. Schriften und Briefe: Zweiter Band. Ed. Promies, Wolfgang. Munich: Carl Hanser, 1971.Google Scholar
Lippitt, John. “Getting the Story Straight: Kierkegaard, MacIntyre, and Some Problems with Narrative Unity.” Inquiry 50:1 (2007): 34–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, Jennifer Ryan. “Kierkegaard’s Indirect Communication of Kant’s Existential Moment.” Res Philosophica 90:4 (2013): 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice. I, Me, Mine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665761.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Løstrup, K.E. Kierkegaard’s and Heidegger’s Analysis of Existence and its Relation to Proclamation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Kirk. “The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (2007): 128–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzon, Bar and Werner, Preston J. “Losing Grip on the Third Realm: Against Naive Realism for Intuitions.” Analysis 82:3 (2022): 435–444.10.1093/analys/anab087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynning, Kristine Hays and Jacobsen, Anja Skaar. “Grasping the Spirit in Nature: Anschauung in Ørsted’s Epistemology of Science and Beauty”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:1 (2011): 45–57.10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mach, Ernst. Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit [History and Origin of the Principles of the Conservation of Work]. Prague: J.G. Calve’sche, 1872. (GWSEA)Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Exposition of Its Principles. Trans. MacCormack, Thomas J.. Chicago: Open Court, 1893. Translation of Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historisch-kritisch dargestellt. 2nd ed. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus, 1888. Originally published 1883. (SM)Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. Knowledge and Error: Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry. Trans. McCormack, Thomas J. and Foulkes, Paul and ed. McGuinness, Brian. (KE) Translation of Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1906. (EI) A shorter version of “On Thought Experiments” was originally published in Zeitschrift für den physikalischen und chemischen Unterricht [Journal for Teaching Physics and Chemistry], 10 (1897): 1–5.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. Die Principien der Wärmelehre [Principles of Thermodynamics]. 3rd ed. Leipzig: J.A. Barth, 1919. First published 1896. (PW)Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. “Ernst Mach (1913).” Ed. Leo Fürst, P., 17–28. In Ernst Mach—A Deeper Look, edited by Blackmore, J.. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations. Trans. Williams, C.M.. Chicago: Open Court, 1897.10.1037/12902-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, Edouard. “The Method of Cases.” In Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 11–44.10.1093/oso/9780198807520.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. “The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): 149–164.10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00087-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. “The Regulative and Reflective Uses of Purposiveness in Kant.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement) (1991): 49–63.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1992.tb00656.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Malm-Lindberg, Ingrid. “The Thought Experimenting Qualities of Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling.” Religions 10:391 (2019): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmgren, Anna-Sara. “Rationalism and the Content of Intuitive Judgments.” Mind 120:478 (2011): 263–327.10.1093/mind/fzr039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, Paul. “The Equivocal Judge William: Comparing the Ethical in Kierkegaard’s Stages on Life’s Way and Either/Or.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary: Stages on Life’s Way, vol. 11. Ed. Perkins, Robert L.. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2000, 91–112.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. “Kant’s Theory of the Imagination.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Ed. Kind, Amy. New York: Routledge, 2016, 55–68.Google Scholar
Maughan-Brown, Frances. “Imagination.” Kierkegaard’s Concepts, vol. 15, Tome III. Ed. Stewart, Jon, Emmanuel, Steven M., and McDonald, William. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014, 195–202.Google Scholar
McDonald, William. “Kierkegaard’s Experimenting Mind.” En The Kierkegaardian Mind. Eds. Buben, Adam, Helms, Eleanor, and Stokes, Patrick. New York: Routledge, 2019, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. “Intuition and Nature in Kant and Goethe.” European Journal of Philosophy 19:3 (2011): 431–453.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Landes, Donald. New York: Routledge, 2013.10.4324/9780203720714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James. “Space, Pure Intuition, and Laws in the Metaphysical Foundations.” In Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Ed. McNulty, Michael Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 98–118.10.1017/9781108661072.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James. “Review of Eric Watkins, Kant on Laws.” Mind 130:519 (2021): 970–978.10.1093/mind/fzaa009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynell, Letitia. “Imagination and Insight: A New Account of the Content of Thought Experiments.” Synthese 191:17 (2014): 4149–4168.10.1007/s11229-014-0519-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic. New York: Longmans, Green & Co, 1898.Google Scholar
Millay, Thomas J. You Must Change Your Life: Søren Kierkegaard’s Philosophy of Reading. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2020.Google Scholar
Miščević, Nenad. “Mental Models and Thought Experiments. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (1992): 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miščević, Nenad. Thought Experiments. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021.Google Scholar
Møller, Poul Martin. Efterladte Skrifter, 3rd ed., vols. 5–6. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzels, 1856.Google Scholar
Moss, Jennifer. Plato’s Epistemology: Being and Seeming. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2021.10.1093/oso/9780198867401.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moue, Aspasia S., Masavetas, Kyriakos A. and Karayianni, Haido. “Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37:1 (2006): 61–75.Google Scholar
Muench, Paul. “Thinking Death into Every Moment: The Existence-Problem of Dying in Kierkegaard’s Postscript.” In Kierkegaard and Death. Eds. Stokes, Patrick and Buben, Adam. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2011, 101–121.Google Scholar
Mumma, John. “Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.” Synthese, 175:2 (2010): 255–287.10.1007/s11229-009-9509-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nado, Jennifer. “Philosophical Expertise and Scientific Expertise.” Philosophical Psychology 28:7 (2015): 1026–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, Shannon. “Contingency, Necessity, and Causation in Kierkegaard’s Theory of Change.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20:1 (2012): 141–162.10.1080/09608788.2011.650976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy. “Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling: Empiricism without Logic.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 20, no. 7 (2007): 125–161.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy. “In the Theoretician’s Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (1992), Symposia and Invited Papers (1992), vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 1993, 291–301.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun and Bruno, Michael. “Intuitions About Personal Identity: An Empirical Study.” Philosophical Psychology 23:3 (2010): 293–312.10.1080/09515089.2010.490939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, John D. “Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism.” In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Ed. Hitchcock, Christopher. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, 44–66.Google Scholar
Norton, John D. “On Thought Experiments: Is There More to the Argument?” Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 1139–1151.10.1086/425238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. “Newcomb’s Problem and Two Principles of Choice.” In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Ed. Rescher, Nicholas. Dordrecht: Springer, 1969.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1974.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. “Aristotle on Human Nature and the Foundation of Ethics.” In World, Mind and Ethics. Eds. Altham, J. and Harrison, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 86–131.10.1017/CBO9780511621086.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. “‘Finely Aware and Richly Responsible’: Moral Attention and the Moral Task of Literature.” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (1985): 516–529.Google Scholar
Ørsted, Anders Sandøe. “Religionens moralske Grundvold [The Moral Ground of Religion].” Ny Minerva 56 (1799): 44–114. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015065140892&seq=7.Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. “Über Geist und Studium der Allgemeinen Naturlehre [On the Spirit and Study of Universal Natural Philosophy]”. Journal für Chemie und Physik 36 (1822): 458–488.Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. Naturlærens mechaniske Deel [The Mechanical Part of Natural Science]. Copenhagen: Reitzels, 1844.Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. Der mechanische Theil der Naturlehre [The Mechanical Part of Natural Science]. Braunschweig, F. Viewig und Sohn, 1851.Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. The Soul in Nature. Trans. Horner, Leonora and Horner, Joanna B. (from German). London: Henry G. Bohn, 1852. (SN) Der Geist in der Natur. Trans. Kannegiesser, K. L.. Leipzig: Carl B. Lorck, 1850. (GN) Translation of Aanden i Naturen. 2 vols. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Høst, 1850. (AN)Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. Samlede og Efterladte Skrifter [Collected and Posthumous Writings]. 9 vols. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Høst, 1851. (SES)Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. “First Introduction to General Physics”. (FI) In Selected Scientific Works of Hans Christian Ørsted. Trans. Jelved, Keren, Jackson, Andrew D., Knudsen, Ole, 282–309. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. Translation of “Første Indlednung til den Almindelige Naturlære”. Naturvidenskabelige Skrifter 3. Ed. Kristine Meyer, 151–190. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst & søn, 1920. (NS 3) Originally published J. F. Schulz, 1811.10.1515/9781400864850.282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. “Letter to Weiss, 30 January 1829”. In Correspondance de H.C. Ørsted avec divers savants [Correspondence of H.C. Ørsted with Various Scholars]. Ed. Harding, M.C., 280–289. Copenhagen: H. Aschehoug, 1920.Google Scholar
Ørsted, Hans Christian. Selected Scientific Works of H.C. Ørsted. Trans. Jelved, Keren, Jackson, Andrew D., and Knudsen, Ole. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. (SSW)10.1515/9781400864850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostaric, Lara. “Practical Cognition, Reflective Judgment, and the Realism of Kant’s Moral Glaube.” In Realism and Antirealism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy: New Essays, Eds. dos Santos, Robinson and Schmidt, Elke Elisabeth. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2018, 91–116.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. On What Matters, vol. 1. Ed. Scheffler, Samuel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Parsons, Charles. “Platonism and Mathematical Intuition in Kurt Gödel’s Thought.” In Philosophy of Mathematics in the Twentieth Century: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014, 153–196.10.4159/harvard.9780674419490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, George. Kierkegaard’s Upbuilding Discourses: Philosophy, Theology, Literature. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Pattison, George. “‘Before God’ as a Regulative Concept.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 2 (1997): 70–86.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. “Explaining the A Priori: The Programme of Moderate Rationalism.” In New Essays on the A Priori. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255–285.Google Scholar
Perkins, Robert, “Comment on Hong.” In Kierkegaard: Resources and Results. Ed. McKinnon, Alastair. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1982, 52–55.10.51644/9780889206991-010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D.Z. and Tessin, Timothy (eds.). Kant and Kierkegaard on Religion, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000.10.1007/978-1-349-62906-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlström, Sami and Siitonen, Arto. “The Transcendental Method and (Post) Empiricist Philosophy of Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeineWissenschaftstheorie 36:1 (2005): 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, Kirk. “Jupiter’s Eagle and the Despot’s Hand Mill: Two Views on Metaphor in Kant.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59:2 (2001): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry P. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . Plato: Complete Works. Ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. Kant’s Political Writings. Ed. Reiss, Hans and trans. Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Redding, Paul. Continental Idealism. New York: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. The Theory of Relativity and a priori Knowledge. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965. Translation of Relativitätstheories und Erkenntnis Apriori. Berlin: Springer, 1920.Google Scholar
Reiss, Julian. “Thought Experiments and Idealizations.” In Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself as Another. Trans. Blamey, K.. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
Rignano, Eugenio. The Psychology of Reasoning. Trans. Holl, Winifred A.. London: K. Paul, Trench, & Trubner, 1923.Google Scholar
Riviere, William T. A Pastor Looks at Kierkegaard: The Man and his Philosophy. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1941.Google Scholar
Robinson, John. “Personal Identity and Survival.” The Journal of Philosophy 85:6 (1988): 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Marcia C. “Kierkegaard’s Existential Play: Storytelling and the Development of the Religious Imagination in the Authorship.” In Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts. Ed. Ziolkowski, Eric. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2018, 71–84.10.2307/j.ctv3znxrg.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkoetter, Timothy. “Kant on the Epistemology of the Obvious.” In The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds: New Essays on Kant’s Metaphysics and Epistemology. Ed. Schafer, Karl and Stang, Nicholas F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, 132–157.10.1093/oso/9780199688265.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, Anthony. “In Defense of Narrative.” European Journal of Philosophy 17:1 (2009): 60–75.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00272.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, Anthony. “Narrative, Expression, and Mental Substance. Inquiry 48:5 (2005), 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, L. “Putting the ‘Experiment’ back into the ‘Thought Experiment’.” Synthese 201:34 (2023): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechter, Elizabeth. “Précis of Self-Consciousness and ‘Split’ Brains: The Minds’ I.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 29:1–2 (2022): 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684878.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Samuel and Saint-Germier, Pierre. “Philosophical Expertise Put to the Test.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101:3 (2023): 592–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, George N. “The Power of Thought Experiments.” Foundations of Physics 26 (1996): 467–482.10.1007/BF02071216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, Lisa H. “Intuition, Thought Experiments, and Philosophical Method: Feminism and Experimental Philosophy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 43:3 (2012): 307–316.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2012.01566.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Theodore Kermit, ed. Sophisms on Meaning and Truth. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger. On Human Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Timothy. “Kant, Naturphilosophie, and Ørsted’s Discovery of Electromagnetism: A Reassessment.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20:3 (1989): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Susanna. The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305296.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1972): 229–243.Google Scholar
Söderquist, Anna Strelis. Kierkegaard on Dialogical Education: Vulnerable Freedom. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Söderquist, K. Brian. The Isolated Self: Truth and Untruth in Søren Kierkegaard’s On the Concept of Irony. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzel, 2007.Google Scholar
Sonderholm, Jorn. “Unreliable Intuitions: A New Reply to the Moral Twin-Earth Argument.” Theoria 79 (2013): 76–88.10.1111/j.1755-2567.2012.01150.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Roy. Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sosa, David. “Skepticism about Intuition.” Philosophy 81:318 (2006): 633–647.10.1017/S0031819106318050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. “Intuitions: Their Nature and Epistemic Efficacy.” Grazer Philosophische Studien: Internationale Zeitschrift für Analytische Philosophie 74 (2007): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. “Rational Intuition: Bealer on Its Nature and Epistemic Status.” Philosophical Studies, 81 (1996): 151–162.10.1007/BF00372779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spagnesi, Lorenzo. “A Rule-Based Account of the Regulative Use of Reason in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” European Journal of Philosophy (2022): 1–16.Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas F. “Kant’s Schematism of the Categories: An Interpretation and Defence.” European Journal of Philosophy (2021): 1–35.Google Scholar
Steinle, Friedrich. “Experiments in History and Philosophy of Science.” Perspectives on Science 10:4 (2002): 408–432.10.1162/106361402322288048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge.” Kantian Review 7 (2003): 72–101.10.1017/S1369415400001746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jon. Kierkegaard’s Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, Stephen and Tobia, Kevin, “Intuition and Its Critics.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James R.. New York: Routledge, 2018, 369–384.Google Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. The Naked Self: Kierkegaard and Personal Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732730.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. “Will It Be Me? Identity, Concern, and Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43:2 (2013): 206–226.10.1080/00455091.2013.826054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. Kierkegaard’s Mirrors: Interest, Self, and Moral Vision. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.10.1057/9780230251267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. “‘See For Yourself’: Contemporaneity, Autopsy and Presence in Kierkegaard’s Moral-Religious Psychology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18:2 (2010): 297–319.10.1080/09608780903422297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. “Cognitive Science and Thought Experiments: A Refutation of Paul Thagard’s Skepticism.” Perspectives on Science 22: 2 (2014): 264–287.10.1162/POSC_a_00130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. and Fehige, Yiftach. “Motivating the History of the Philosophy of Thought Experiments.” HOPOS 11 (2021): 212–221.Google Scholar
Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “The Problem of Evil: Analytic Philosophy and Narrative.” In Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Eds. Crisp, Oliver D. and Rea, Michael C.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009, 251–264.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203567.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudan, Meghant. “The Kantian Roots of Hegel’s Theory of the Imagination.” In The Imagination in German Idealism and Romanticism. Eds. Gentry, Gerad and Pollok, Konstantin. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 127–149.Google Scholar
Swain, Stacey, Alexander, Joshua, and Weinberg, Jonathan M.. “The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76:1 (2008): 138–155.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00118.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabb, Kathryn. “Madness as Method: On Locke’s Thought Experiments about Personal Identity.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26:5 (2018): 871–889.10.1080/09608788.2017.1350936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Chenxi. “Kierkegaard and the Culture of Psychological Experimentation in the Nineteenth Century.” KulturPoetik 6:2 (2006): 172–188.Google Scholar
Taylor, Mark C. Journeys to Selfhood: Hegel & Kierkegaard. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in ‘Groundwork III.’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84:3 (2012): 555–589.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00462.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1:1 (1971): 47–66.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “The Trolley Problem.” The Yale Law Journal 94:6 (1985): 1395–1415.10.2307/796133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjønneland, Eivind. Ironie als Symptom. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Søren Kierkegaards. Über den Begriff der Ironie. Bern: Peter Lang, 2004.Google Scholar
Tobia, Kevin, Newman, George E., and Knobe, Joshua. “Water Is and Is Not H2O.” Mind and Language 35:2 (2020): 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobia, Kevin (ed.). Experimental Philosophy of Identity and the Self. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.10.5040/9781350246928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. “Husserl’s Account of Cognition and the Legacy of Kantianism.” In The Husserlian Mind. Ed. Jacobs, Hanne. New York: Routledge, 2021, 283–300.10.4324/9780429243790-28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. “Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of our Representations.” Synthese 197 (2020): 3215–3244.10.1007/s11229-017-1625-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troelsen, Bjarne, “Hans Christian Ørsted: Søren Kierkegaard and The Spirit in Nature.” In Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception, and Resources, vol. 7 (Kierkegaard and His Danish Contemporaries), Tome 1 (Philosophy, Politics, and Social Theory). Ed. Stewart, Jon. New York: Routledge, 2009, 215–228.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. “Modal Epistemology.” Philosophical Studies 92:1/2 (1998): 67–84.Google Scholar
Verstrynge, Karl. “The Perfection of the Kierkegaardian Self in Regulative Perspective.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 9 (2004): 473–495.Google Scholar
Veryheyden, Jack. “The Ethical and the Religious as Law and Gospel.” In Kant and Kierkegaard on Religion. Eds. Phillips, D.Z. and Tessin, Timothy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000, 153–77.Google Scholar
Walden, Kenneth. “Reason Unbound: Kant’s Theory of Regulative Principles.” European Journal of Philosophy 27 (2019): 575–295.10.1111/ejop.12419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Sylvia, Living Poetically: Kierkegaard’s Existential Aesthetics. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. Kant on Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.10.1017/9781316683026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric and Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant’s Account of Cognition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55:1 (2017): 83–112.10.1353/hph.2017.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Daniel. “Kierkegaard on Truth: One or Many?” Mind 127:505 (2018): 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Daniel. “Kierkegaard and the Limits of Thought.” Hegel Bulletin 39:1 (2016), 82–105.10.1017/hgl.2016.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Daniel. “The Paradox of Beginning: Hegel, Kierkegaard and Philosophical Inquiry.” Inquiry 50:1 (2007): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. “Kant, Hegel, and the Fate of the Intuitive Intellect.” In The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Ed. Sedgwick, Sally. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 283–305.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Kierkegaard’s Concept of Faith. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “Reply to Eleanor Helms on Faith versus Reason in Kierkegaard.” Faith and Philosophy 35:3 (2018): 367–372.10.5840/faithphil2018613105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Becoming a Self: A Reading of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Kierkegaard’s Critique of Reason and Society. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Wilkes, Kathleen. Real People: Personal Identity Without Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus and Watkins, Eric. “Kant on Cognition and Knowledge.” Synthese, 197: 8 (2020): 3195–3213.10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Williams, Garrath. “Kant’s Account of Reason.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri. Spring 2023 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-reason/Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. “Philosophical ‘Intuitions’ and Scepticism about Judgement.” Dialectica 58, no. 1 (2004): 109–153.10.1111/j.1746-8361.2004.tb00294.x10.1111/j.1746-8361.2004.tb00294.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Andrew D. “Introduction.” In Selected Scientific Works of Hans Christian Ørsted. Ed. and trans. Jelved, Karen, Jackson, Andrew D. and Knudsen, Ole. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998, xv–xl.Google Scholar
Wiltsche, Harald. “The Forever War: Understanding, Science Fiction, and Thought Experiments.” Synthese 198:4 (2021): 3675–3698.10.1007/s11229-019-02306-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiltsche, Harald. “How Essential Are Essential Laws: A Thought Experiment on the Perspectival Givenness of Physical Things.” In Wahrnehmen, Fühlen, Handeln. Phänemenologie im Wettstreit der Methoden. Eds. Mertens, Karl and Günzler, Ingo. Paderborn: Mentis, 2013, 421–436.10.30965/9783897859722_032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltsche, Harald. “Phenomenology and Thought Experiments: Thought Experiments as Anticipation Pumps.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert. New York: Routledge, 2018, 342–365.Google Scholar
Wiltsche, Harald. “Intuitions, Seemings, and Phenomenology.” Teorema: Revista International de Filosofia 34:3 (2015): 57–78.Google Scholar
Witt-Hansen, Johannes. “H.C. Ørsted: Immanuel Kant and the Thought Experiment.” In Kierkegaard and His Contemporaries: The Culture of Golden Age Denmark. Ed. Stewart, Jon. Copenhagen: De Gruyter, 2003, 62–77. Reprint of “H.C. Ørsted, Kant and the Thought Experiment.” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 13 (1976): 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allan W. “Coercion, Manipulation, Exploitation.” In Manipulation: Theory and Practice. Eds. Coons, Christian and Weber, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wood, Allan W. Kant and Religion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.10.1017/9781108381512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Ava. “Rightful Machines.” In Kant and Artificial Intelligence. Eds. Kim, Hyeongjoo and Schönecker, Dieter. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.10.7551/mitpress/6541.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511487323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Eleanor Helms, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: Kierkegaard and the Structure of Imagination
  • Online publication: 26 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009594929.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Eleanor Helms, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: Kierkegaard and the Structure of Imagination
  • Online publication: 26 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009594929.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Eleanor Helms, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: Kierkegaard and the Structure of Imagination
  • Online publication: 26 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009594929.021
Available formats
×