Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Project Behavior
- Cambridge Handbook of Project Behavior
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Guiding Principles
- Part II Deviating from Plans
- Chapter 6 Averaging Out Divergent Project Behavior
- Chapter 7 Intra- and Inter-Organizational Governance and the Behavior of Projects
- Chapter 8 Strategic Alignment, Uncertainties, and Realignment of Project Portfolios
- Chapter 9 Stakeholder Perceptions and Project Performance
- Chapter 10 Governance Shifts and Short-term Performance
- Chapter 11 Maximum Feasible Project Failure
- Chapter 12 Project Misbehavior in Infrastructure Projects
- Part III Practical Tips
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - Intra- and Inter-Organizational Governance and the Behavior of Projects
from Part II - Deviating from Plans
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2025
By
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Project Behavior
- Cambridge Handbook of Project Behavior
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Guiding Principles
- Part II Deviating from Plans
- Chapter 6 Averaging Out Divergent Project Behavior
- Chapter 7 Intra- and Inter-Organizational Governance and the Behavior of Projects
- Chapter 8 Strategic Alignment, Uncertainties, and Realignment of Project Portfolios
- Chapter 9 Stakeholder Perceptions and Project Performance
- Chapter 10 Governance Shifts and Short-term Performance
- Chapter 11 Maximum Feasible Project Failure
- Chapter 12 Project Misbehavior in Infrastructure Projects
- Part III Practical Tips
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter addresses the impact of governance on project behavior from an intra-organizational and an inter-organizational perspective. It starts by introducing governance fundamentals, like principles, approaches, standards, and paradigms, and subsequently describes the implications of these fundamentals for project behavior. Four behavior types are identified based on projects’ teleological, deontological, introvert, and extravert behavior. The inter-organizational view introduces a three-layered model for the governance of inter-organizational networks for large and megaprojects. This addresses multi-layer governance at the levels of a) network governance (i.e., for a single project), b) governance of networks (i.e., for the network of networks for several projects of a firm), and c) metagovernance (i.e., the investor’s ground rules for governance). The reader benefits from the discussion on the impact of these layers on project behavior, from understanding the impact of governance complexity on project behavior, and the practical examples given throughout the text.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Project Behavior , pp. 115 - 129Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
APM. (2011). Directing change: A guide to governance of project management. Association for Project Management.Google Scholar
Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., and Delbridge, R. (2009). Escape from the iron cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britannica.com. (2022). Introvert and extrovert. www.britannica.com/science/introvert.Google Scholar
Carlisle, K., and Gruby, R. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 921–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwell, F. (2022). The sociology of Max Weber. https://academic.udayton.edu/RichardGhere/POL
307/weber.htm.Google Scholar
Fiedler, J., and Wendler, A. (2016). Berlin Brandenburg Airport (pp. 1–206). In Kostka, G. and Fiedler, J. (eds.). Large infrastructure projects in Germany: Between ambition and realities. Springer International.Google Scholar
Geraldi, J., and Söderlund, J. (2018). Project studies: What it is, where it is going. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, N., and Pinto, J. K. (2018). Polycentric organizing and performance: A contingency model and evidence from megaproject planning in the UK. Research Policy, 47(4), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, S., and Hill, J. (2017). An analysis of Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. Macat International.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., and Marks, G. (2001). Types of multi-level governance. European Integration Online Papers, 5(11), 9163–9170. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sm90238d.Google Scholar
ISO. (2017). Project, programme and portfolio management: Guidance on governance. ISO Copyright Office.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2015). From governance to governance failure and from multi-level governance to multi-scalar meta-governance (pp. 625–646). In Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (eds.). Multi-level governance: Essential readings I. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Joslin, R, and Müller, R. (2016). The relationship between project governance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 613–626.10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joslin, Robert, and Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between project methodology and success in different governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R., and Hobbs, B. (2005). Governance regimes for large projects. Project Management Journal, 36(3), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, P. W. G. (1994). The management of projects. Thomas Telford.10.1680/mop.16934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R. (2017). Organizational project governance (pp. 11–24). In Müller, R. (ed.), Governance and governmentality for projects: Enablers, practice and consequences. Routledge.10.4324/9781315245928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R., and Lecoeuvre, L. (2014). Operationalizing governance categories of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R., Alix-Séguin, C., Alonderienė, R., Bourgault, M., Chmielauskas, A., Drouin, N., Ke, Y., Minelgaite, I., Pilkienė, M., Šimkonis, S. and Unterhitzenberger, C., 2024. Vaagaasar, A.L., and Zhu, F. A (meta) governance framework for multi-level governance of inter-organizational project networks. Production Planning & Control, 35(10), 1043–1062.10.1080/09537287.2022.2146018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R, and Turner, J. R. (2007). The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. European Management Journal, 25(4), 289–309.10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2001). Governance in the 21st Century. OECD. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/futures/17394484.pdf.Google Scholar
PMI. (2016). Governance of portfolios, programs, and projects: A practice guide. Project Management Institute, USA. www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/learning/portfolio-program-project-governance-practice-guide.ashx.Google Scholar
Šimkonis, Š., Müller, R., Alonderienė, R., Chmieliauskas, A., and Pilkienė, M. (2021). Multi-level governance in inter-organizational project settings (pp. 1–20). In Proceedings of the British Academy of Management (BAM) Conference in the Cloud, October 31 to September 2, 2021, Lancaster University, UK.Google Scholar
Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism and the design of democratic governance. Governance, 18(1), 89–111.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00267.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teworte, V., and Albeniz, V. M. (2015). Berlin Brandenburg International Airport. ES617P-1142-E, IESE.Google Scholar
Turner, J. R. (2022). Using principal–steward contracting and scenario planning to manage megaprojects. Project Management Journal, 53(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211061836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. R., and Müller, R. (2004). Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent. European Management Journal, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unterhitzenberger, C. (2021). Special issue on project behavior. Project Management Journal, 52(6), 527–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211054716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unterhitzenberger, C., Müller, R., Vaagaasar, A. L., Ke, Y., Alonderienė, R., Minelgaite, I., Pilkiene, M., Wang, L., Zhu, F., Drouin, N., Chmieliauskas, A., Simkonis, S., and Mongeon, M. (2022). A multi-level governance model for inter-organizational project networks. Project Management Journal, 54(1), 88–105.10.1177/87569728221131254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitell, S. J., and Davis, D. L. (1990). Ethical beliefs of MIS professionals: The frequency and opportunity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, Z., Ahola, T., Le, Y., and Xie, J. (2017). Governmental gGovernance of megaprojects: The case of EXPO 2010 Shanghai. Project Management Journal, 48(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.